chw42 Posted September 14, 2016 Share Posted September 14, 2016 (edited) He's having the best season of any White Sox positional player in a long time. I'm talking 15 years here. Eaton currently sits at 5.8 fWAR and is projected to have around 6.2 fWAR by the end of the season. FWIW, bWAR has him slightly higher at 6 bWAR. Even if he finishes at 5.8 fWAR, it will be the highest total by any White Sox positional player since Frank Thomas's near MVP season in 2000, when he accumulated 5.9 fWAR. Most of Eaton's value comes from defense, but I don't think any of us can disagree that he's been extremely valuable defensively this year. He's currently 7th in fWAR among all American League position players. His performance this year definitely moves his talent perception up. I think before this season, most viewed Eaton as a 3-4 win player. But now I think it's safe to say he's at least a 4-5 win player worthy of all-star consideration. White Sox fWAR Leaderboard over last 25 years. Edit: Eaton's 2016 is the 12th best season by any White Sox positional player in the past 25 years. Tied with Aaron Rowand in 2004 and behind numerous Frank Thomas seasons and that one year Albert Belle hit 49 homers. Edited September 14, 2016 by chw42 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyyle23 Posted September 14, 2016 Share Posted September 14, 2016 They should trade him for good prospects because the last three seasons were all flukes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowand44 Posted September 14, 2016 Share Posted September 14, 2016 I obviously know he's been tremendous this year but holy hell that's pretty absurd. Thanks for sharing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chitownsportsfan Posted September 14, 2016 Share Posted September 14, 2016 (edited) Eaton is great. Need more like him. Runs his mouth a little bit too much for my liking but s*** put up numbers like this and he can b**** and moan about management, etc all he wants. Edited September 14, 2016 by chitownsportsfan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shysocks Posted September 14, 2016 Share Posted September 14, 2016 The best part of all is that he's answered questions about whether that power surge last year was a fluke. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OmarComing25 Posted September 14, 2016 Share Posted September 14, 2016 7th among AL position players but 9th overall, he'd be the first White Sox player to finish in the top ten in MLB in WAR since Albert Belle in 1998. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chw42 Posted September 14, 2016 Author Share Posted September 14, 2016 QUOTE (shysocks @ Sep 14, 2016 -> 03:58 PM) The best part of all is that he's answered questions about whether that power surge last year was a fluke. His offensive numbers have been nearly identical this year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chw42 Posted September 14, 2016 Author Share Posted September 14, 2016 QUOTE (OmarComing25 @ Sep 14, 2016 -> 04:00 PM) 7th among AL position players but 9th overall, he'd be the first White Sox player to finish in the top ten in MLB in WAR since Albert Belle in 1998. If the AL wasn't flooded with great positional players, he should be getting some top 5 MVP votes from some of the more sabermetric-inclined voters. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YouCanPutItOnTheBoardYES! Posted September 14, 2016 Share Posted September 14, 2016 He's a great 4th outfielder. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shysocks Posted September 14, 2016 Share Posted September 14, 2016 Lest anybody take Mike's post seriously, it's a reference to this incredible Haugh column from before the season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted September 14, 2016 Share Posted September 14, 2016 QUOTE (shysocks @ Sep 14, 2016 -> 04:39 PM) Lest anybody take Mike's post seriously, it's a reference to this incredible Haugh column from before the season. Ah yes, I remember that very short period of time where a couple of posters told us that we lost the Eaton/Santiago trade, completely with an idiot in the media picking it up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxAce Posted September 14, 2016 Share Posted September 14, 2016 He's figured out to put the average and the power together. It's been fun to watch. People forget he's still pretty young. Just entering his prime. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
COACH612 Posted September 15, 2016 Share Posted September 15, 2016 I say trade him and get an aging veterans for the DH position whose 1st name is Adam. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiSox59 Posted September 15, 2016 Share Posted September 15, 2016 (edited) Adam is great. However, if they do trade Sale and/or Q this winter, I'd be in support of moving Adam. The dude's value shouldn't be much lower than those two, in all honesty. He's really f'in good. That said, I hope they don't trade him - he's by far my favorite player. Edited September 15, 2016 by ChiSox59 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted September 15, 2016 Share Posted September 15, 2016 CSN Chicago @CSNChicago 40m40 minutes ago Red Sox outfielder Mookie Betts could challenge Adam Eaton for Gold Glove: http://bit.ly/2cBrDua Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jose Abreu Posted September 15, 2016 Share Posted September 15, 2016 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Sep 15, 2016 -> 02:25 PM) CSN Chicago @CSNChicago 40m40 minutes ago Red Sox outfielder Mookie Betts could challenge Adam Eaton for Gold Glove: http://bit.ly/2cBrDua Betts won't be challenging, he'll be winning. East coast bias Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chw42 Posted September 15, 2016 Author Share Posted September 15, 2016 (edited) QUOTE (Jose Abreu @ Sep 15, 2016 -> 04:01 PM) Betts won't be challenging, he'll be winning. East coast bias Betts has a good case as well. Has more DRS than Eaton, but UZR likes Eaton a bit more. I don't see why both can't win. There's 3 OF spots. Edit: are the 3 OF spots regardless of position or do they take position into account? Edited September 15, 2016 by chw42 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OmarComing25 Posted September 15, 2016 Share Posted September 15, 2016 (edited) QUOTE (chw42 @ Sep 15, 2016 -> 04:45 PM) Betts has a good case as well. Has more DRS than Eaton, but UZR likes Eaton a bit more. I don't see why both can't win. There's 3 OF spots. Edit: are the 3 OF spots regardless of position or do they take position into account? I thought it was just 3 OF spots regardless of position. EDIT: Nope I'm wrong. That's how it used to be, but they changed it a few years ago. Edited September 15, 2016 by OmarComing25 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chw42 Posted September 15, 2016 Author Share Posted September 15, 2016 QUOTE (OmarComing25 @ Sep 15, 2016 -> 04:51 PM) I thought it was just 3 OF spots regardless of position. According to the way it's listed here: http://m.mlb.com/awards/ It seems like it's by individual positions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OmarComing25 Posted September 15, 2016 Share Posted September 15, 2016 QUOTE (chw42 @ Sep 15, 2016 -> 04:52 PM) According to the way it's listed here: http://m.mlb.com/awards/ It seems like it's by individual positions. Yep, I was wrong. http://actasports.com/blog/changes-in-qual...ld-gold-gloves/ September 23, 2011 According to an article written Wednesday by Evan Brunell for CBS Sports, Rawlings has altered the criteria of eligibility for the Gold Glove Awards. The biggest change is for outfielders. Instead of voters being allowed to vote for three outfielders in each league regardless of position, they will now be required to vote for one outfielder at each position individually. So now a Gold Glove will be awarded for left field, center field, and right field separately. This is a very welcomed change, as we have always felt that the best player at each position should be recognized for his performance, which is why the Fielding Bible Awards have always been given for each outfield position individually. Under the old system of Gold Glove voting, corner outfielders were at a disadvantage. Now they will be given the recognition that they deserve. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiliIrishHammock24 Posted September 18, 2016 Share Posted September 18, 2016 It makes sense to just give it to the 3 best OF, regardless of position, even if CFs are the best, but then again, we award one for SS and one for 2B, even though SS are generally better. I think Betts gets it no doubt. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.