Jump to content

President Donald Trump: The Thread


Steve9347
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 7.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

QUOTE (MexSoxFan#1 @ Oct 25, 2017 -> 03:23 AM)
I honestly think that Trump in the long run will do more damage to the GOP than anyone can imagine right now. His behavior is just not sustainable. At some point the vast majority will reject Trumpism, it is already opposed by the majority of Americans.

 

Either that or this country is truly dumber than we think and it's on full on decline.

To the first - yeah, but the minority has made it so difficult for the rest to vote that it doesn't matter.

 

To the latter, remember, if the whole country declines, the "Blah" peoples decline to. We've decided as a nation we're ok with that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Oct 24, 2017 -> 05:58 PM)
I probably should have clarified I meant current republican politicians. I think most of them have the same thoughts these 3 have, but are afraid of what they may lose if they say. There are obviously a few screwballs that bow to his every word,but the juvenile way he works can't go on. At some point more will break. They have to. It isn't like he is suddenly going to behave like an adult. And if they get their tax cuts, Trump will take full credit like he is the stock market.

Yeah, but the Republicans have bigger priorities.

 

After his brave speech yesterday about how we can't let this possibly go on any more, Jeff Flake Bravely stood up and said "if a bank steals $20 from a million customers, we should be ok with that. That's the kind of thing that makes America work, small time fraud on huge scales." Brave.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (RockRaines @ Oct 25, 2017 -> 07:41 AM)
This was literally written in 2016. Didn’t we all already know this? Is this to smokescreen the fact that Trump outsourced his research to Russia?

 

We knew that the dossier started its life with the Jeb and Cruz campaigns and after the primaries was then funded by "Democrat-associated people" but the DNC and Clinton camp denied direct involvement IIRC. Either way though, there's nothing unusual about conducting opposition research. The work appears to have been legit, and Mueller and Co. will investigate and substantiate what claims, if any, are true.

 

And yeah it's still a couple of steps removed from receiving emails saying "would you like to collude with the Russian government's efforts to help you win" "yes!!!!"

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/nation...bbb9_story.html

 

 

 

Officials have said that the FBI has confirmed some of the information in the dossier. Other details, including the most sensational accusations, have not been verified and may never be.

 

Fusion GPS’s work researching Trump began during the Republican presidential primaries, when the GOP donor paid for the firm to investigate the real estate magnate’s background.

 

Fusion GPS did not start off looking at Trump’s Russia ties but quickly realized that those relationships were extensive, according to the people familiar with the matter.

 

When the Republican donor stopped paying for the research, Elias, acting on behalf of the Clinton campaign and the DNC, agreed to pay for the work to continue. The Democrats paid for research, including by Fusion GPS, because of concerns that little was known about Trump and his business interests, according to the people familiar with the matter.

 

Those people said that it is standard practice for political campaigns to use law firms to hire outside researchers to ensure their work is protected by attorney-client and work-product privileges.

Edited by StrangeSox
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Inside Trump’s meeting with Senate GOP

 

But other senators were less amused by the meeting, which they complained lacked substance and focus.

 

“He said the tax cuts are ‘going to be great,’ ” without going into any detail, said one GOP senator who requested anonymity to assess the meeting candidly.

 

“He just went on and on, talking about his accomplishments and going off on tangents. It was inane,” the lawmaker added.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Oct 25, 2017 -> 08:30 AM)
We knew that the dossier started its life with the Jeb and Cruz campaigns and after the primaries was then funded by "Democrat-associated people" but the DNC and Clinton camp denied direct involvement IIRC. Either way though, there's nothing unusual about conducting opposition research. The work appears to have been legit, and Mueller and Co. will investigate and substantiate what claims, if any, are true.

 

And yeah it's still a couple of steps removed from receiving emails saying "would you like to collude with the Russian government's efforts to help you win" "yes!!!!"

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/nation...bbb9_story.html

It is plausibly also worth noting that someone felt it important to send the name of the Democrat involved in paying for this opposition research to the Washington Post without sending the name of the Republican. Almost as if someone is scared of more of its contents being verified and trying to distract, but without damaging anyone on that side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/24/politics/tru...nley/index.html

More pettiness, this time trying to reverse Obama renaming of Mt. McKinley to Denali despite opposition

 

“Lisa -- Sen. Murkowski -- and I jumped over the desk," (GOP Senator Dan) Sullivan said. "We said no, no!"

Trump, perplexed that the two Republicans wanted to keep an Obama-era decision, asked why.

 

"The Alaska Native people named that mountain over 10,000 years ago," Sullivan said. "Denali, that was the name."

Sullivan's office confirmed the conversation to CNN. The White House declined to comment.

 

 

Btw, Cassidy and Graham crossed lines to vote for the rights of consumer protection, fwiw.

Edited by caulfield12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Oct 25, 2017 -> 09:30 AM)
We knew that the dossier started its life with the Jeb and Cruz campaigns and after the primaries was then funded by "Democrat-associated people" but the DNC and Clinton camp denied direct involvement IIRC. Either way though, there's nothing unusual about conducting opposition research. The work appears to have been legit, and Mueller and Co. will investigate and substantiate what claims, if any, are true.

 

And yeah it's still a couple of steps removed from receiving emails saying "would you like to collude with the Russian government's efforts to help you win" "yes!!!!"

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/nation...bbb9_story.html

 

Also a few steps from publicly requesting Russian interference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ Oct 25, 2017 -> 11:07 AM)
Commander in Chief does not accept responsibility for military action. Has that ever happened before? Honest question

 

Nothing bad is ever his fault. He will throw everyone else under the bus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@axios

Trump on speaking with widow of Sgt. Johnson that he got the name correct: "One of the great memories of all time."

 

And then there's this...

 

Trump said "I don't remember" 35 times when he was deposed in Trump University case. 35 times.

 

tweet

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Oct 24, 2017 -> 08:55 AM)
Whitefish, one of America’s smallest electric companies, landed Puerto Rico’s biggest contract to get power back on.

 

This two-person company just got a $300M contract to restore power in Puerto Rico. They just happen to know Sec. of Interior Zinke pretty well and are from his hometown. They're charging $300+ per hour for linemen where other utilities were offering them in mutual aid.

 

They're taking a page out of Trump's playbook and attacking the mayor of San Juan on twitter now, threatening to pull out resources because she called for transparency.

 

https://www.buzzfeed.com/davidmack/the-mont...PKMz#.krG4DYJnb

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Oct 25, 2017 -> 04:41 PM)
They're taking a page out of Trump's playbook and attacking the mayor of San Juan on twitter now, threatening to pull out resources because she called for transparency.

 

https://www.buzzfeed.com/davidmack/the-mont...PKMz#.krG4DYJnb

I didn't want to post that because it wasn't a verified account, are we 100% sure that's from the company?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Oct 25, 2017 -> 04:44 PM)
I didn't want to post that because it wasn't a verified account, are we 100% sure that's from the company?

 

The account's been posting relevant stuff going back weeks (before anyone knew who they were) and was created last year. I wouldn't expect a 2-person operation to get a twitter blue check. If they're a fake, they've been spoofing the company by making posts about the local power market in Montana going back to last December.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Oct 25, 2017 -> 04:41 PM)
They're taking a page out of Trump's playbook and attacking the mayor of San Juan on twitter now, threatening to pull out resources because she called for transparency.

 

https://www.buzzfeed.com/davidmack/the-mont...PKMz#.krG4DYJnb

So much for draining the swamp

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trump is so cocky and full of himself it's incredible. He was talking on some show today about standing ovations he got at some rally and on and on about how people love him. Hard to believe such a rich creep fooled America to vote him in.

Seems enough voters just liked his non P.C. style in a debate format and speech format and they overlooked how rich and unlikeable he is. Good thing we have a system of checks and balances or he really might do something destructive. He is one annoying rich guy that is for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (raBBit @ Oct 26, 2017 -> 10:55 AM)
Supposedly Trump is to address the opioid crisis today. Obviously that would seem like a good thing as it is a major problem in America. I just worry about Sessions with anything related to drugs. Such an archaic POV on these matters.

 

I dont even know who the people are that support some of the inane way drugs are criminalized in this country.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (raBBit @ Oct 26, 2017 -> 10:55 AM)
Supposedly Trump is to address the opioid crisis today. Obviously that would seem like a good thing as it is a major problem in America. I just worry about Sessions with anything related to drugs. Such an archaic POV on these matters.

 

He is going to declare a crisis, and will not put any federal funds towards dealing with the crisis

 

So, basically yelling “FIRE!!” Then walking away with a firehose in his hand

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...