ChiSox59 Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Feb 25, 2016 -> 01:14 PM) It isn't really "everyday" though. Most teams have one left starter, MAYBE two. The AL Central lefty starters are pretty much all White Sox. Ugh. You get the point. He's not a guy you want to run out there against LHP. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Feb 25, 2016 -> 02:29 PM) Look at their big hitters and see if they are LH or RH. That probably has a lot to do with it. The Rangers are really lefthanded. 1 or 2 a game adds up. Then that argues teams do a much better job of targeting your hitters with weak platoon splits than I would have imagined. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Feb 25, 2016 -> 01:40 PM) Then that argues teams do a much better job of targeting your hitters with weak platoon splits than I would have imagined. I don't think it really has as much to do with rotations athough I suppose if for a team like the Rangers you could skip the 5th starter who throws RH and go all lefty, maybe they do that, but I think a lot of it as to do with bullpens. Managers love L/L, R/R match ups. If a team is mostly lefthanded, they are going to see more lefty pitching, and vice versa. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GGajewski18 Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 What would it take to get Reddick from the A's? Any thoughts? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Feb 25, 2016 -> 02:50 PM) I don't think it really has as much to do with rotations athough I suppose if for a team like the Rangers you could skip the 5th starter who throws RH and go all lefty, maybe they do that, but I think a lot of it as to do with bullpens. Managers love L/L, R/R match ups. If a team is mostly lefthanded, they are going to see more lefty pitching, and vice versa. Like I said, that translated to an extra 1000 PAs against left handed pitching for the Rangers compared to the Marlins. That's like 27 extra full games of facing lefties during a season. I'd have never guessed teams could pull that off. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 Sure seems like Austin Jackson has limited options right now. Really only see WSox, Rangers, Angels and Indians. Indians, Rangers and Angels supposedly don't have payroll space. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Feb 25, 2016 -> 01:53 PM) Like I said, that translated to an extra 1000 PAs against left handed pitching for the Rangers compared to the Marlins. That's like 27 extra full games of facing lefties during a season. I'd have never guessed teams could pull that off. The top 10 teams were all AL. I would take the AL averages and see how it compares. Of course the next to bottom was Detroit, a mostly RH line up. I think the answer is pretty simple. You want to limit LHP vs. Detroit, and maximize LHP vs. Texas. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCalSox Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 QUOTE (fathom @ Feb 25, 2016 -> 01:10 PM) Sure seems like Austin Jackson has limited options right now. Really only see WSox, Rangers, Angels and Indians. Indians, Rangers and Angels supposedly don't have payroll space. We've said that with just about every FA out there so far & yet we are still here. I'm not ruling out any team at this point for any player. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 QUOTE (SoCalSox @ Feb 25, 2016 -> 10:24 PM) We've said that with just about every FA out there so far & yet we are still here. I'm not ruling out any team at this point for any player. It is kind of crazy how some of these deals have come out of nowhere (Khris Davis, Coghlan), yet the Sox have been linked to just about everyone and nothing's happened. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCalSox Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 QUOTE (fathom @ Feb 25, 2016 -> 01:26 PM) It is kind of crazy how some of these deals have come out of nowhere (Khris Davis, Coghlan), yet the Sox have been linked to just about everyone and nothing's happened. I'm at a loss for words with how this has all shaken out. I honestly don't understand it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 (edited) QUOTE (SoCalSox @ Feb 25, 2016 -> 10:26 PM) I'm at a loss for words with how this has all shaken out. I honestly don't understand it. I've been of the belief they have no money left, but then you see a deal like Coghlan's today and they could have easily offset his salary by unloading someone like Petricka. It really makes me think they're specifically targeting someone. I'm gonna go with what Levine has been saying and it's a lefty with power. He's been very specific in reporting that. Edited February 25, 2016 by fathom Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCalSox Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 (edited) QUOTE (fathom @ Feb 25, 2016 -> 01:28 PM) I've been of the belief they have no money left, but then you see a deal like Coghlan's today and they could have easily offset his salary by unloading someone like Petricka. It really makes me think they're specifically targeting someone. Who fits the bill at this point? Bruce is expensive in terms of salary. Maybe Jennings or Guyer? Reddick? I wish we had an idea what was going on. Also, how accurate has Levine been lately? I haven't really been keeping tabs. Edited February 25, 2016 by SoCalSox Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 QUOTE (SoCalSox @ Feb 25, 2016 -> 09:29 PM) Who fits the bill at this point? Bruce is expensive in terms of salary. Maybe Jennings or Guyer? Reddick? I wish we had an idea what was going on. Also, how accurate has Levine been lately? I haven't really been keeping tabs. The lefty candidates would be Ethier, Reddick and Bruce. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago White Sox Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 QUOTE (fathom @ Feb 25, 2016 -> 03:31 PM) The lefty candidates would be Ethier, Reddick and Bruce. I agree with you fathom, either they're determined to find a left-handed power bat to slot between Abreu & Frazier or they're still high on Avi turning the corner. I'm still hopeful it's the former as it would explain a lot of the rumors/quotes but overall lack of action to date. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 QUOTE (Chicago White Sox @ Feb 25, 2016 -> 09:49 PM) I agree with you fathom, either they're determined to find a left-handed power bat to slot between Abreu & Frazier or they're still high on Avi turning the corner. I'm still hopeful it's the former as it would explain a lot of the rumors/quotes but overall lack of action to date. They still might be high on Avi turning the corner, but I still think they want some competition for him and/or LaRoche. Even if they're 100% behind Avi, they have the perfect chance to get Raburn to platoon with LaRoche. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDF Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 QUOTE (fathom @ Feb 25, 2016 -> 09:31 PM) The lefty candidates would be Ethier, Reddick and Bruce. i don't know about bruce, i look at his stats and he seems to be not performing as he was 3 yrs ago. is he declining, injury too much, i just can't figure this out, but then again we are talking about cincy, the price to get him will be too much. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunt Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 Reddick would be ideal, but I don't see the A's moving him. Pretty sure both sides are hoping to work out an extension. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whisox05 Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 QUOTE (LDF @ Feb 25, 2016 -> 04:07 PM) i don't know about bruce, i look at his stats and he seems to be not performing as he was 3 yrs ago. is he declining, injury too much, i just can't figure this out, but then again we are talking about cincy, the price to get him will be too much. Supposedly the price for bruce isn't high according to the almost 3 team trade involving him. Honestly of you look at Bruce's career stats and Fraziers they almost have put up the same avg, obp, slugging, and ops. Tho bruce has 2000+ more plate appearances then Frazier. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YouCanPutItOnTheBoardYES! Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 Trade Danish, Shuck, and Sanchez for Reddick and sign Raburn. Eaton Melky Abreu Frazier Reddick Lawrie LaRoche Navarro Rollins with the bench being Raburn, Avila, Saladino, and Avi. Done. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 I dislike that so much more than a 1 year deal with a loss of a pick for Fowler. You are trading three low ceiling, but likely, major leaguers to the As in that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YouCanPutItOnTheBoardYES! Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 QUOTE (bmags @ Feb 25, 2016 -> 04:17 PM) I dislike that so much more than a 1 year deal with a loss of a pick for Fowler. You are trading three low ceiling, but likely, major leaguers to the As in that. Meh. I disagree. Shuck is nothing but a 4th outfielder, Sanchez is essentially Semien 2.0 with better defense and a worse bat, and Danish struggled mightily in AA last year. I wouldn't be sad to see any of them leave to be honest. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 QUOTE (ChiSoxFanMike @ Feb 25, 2016 -> 04:32 PM) Meh. I disagree. Shuck is nothing but a 4th outfielder, Sanchez is essentially Semien 2.0 with better defense and a worse bat, and Danish struggled mightily in AA last year. I wouldn't be sad to see any of them leave to be honest. Couldn't see the A's accepting that deal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YouCanPutItOnTheBoardYES! Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 QUOTE (soxfan2014 @ Feb 25, 2016 -> 04:38 PM) Couldn't see the A's accepting that deal. They have like 7 outfielders now. How are they going to be able to play them all? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxSteve Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 QUOTE (ChiSoxFanMike @ Feb 25, 2016 -> 04:52 PM) They have like 7 outfielders now. How are they going to be able to play them all? Maybe Kenny will finally get the guy he always wanted. Chone Figgins. I kid i kid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 QUOTE (ChiSoxFanMike @ Feb 25, 2016 -> 10:52 PM) They have like 7 outfielders now. How are they going to be able to play them all? Burns, Canha, Reddick, Coghlan and Davis. They can just get rid of Fuld and Crisp is still banged up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.