-
Posts
38,989 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
206
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Chicago White Sox
-
Depending on the price, I'm more than content with this move. We got nearly -2 WAR out of the 3B position last year and assuming Lawrie's defensive performance in 2015 was an outlier, he should be a 2 to 2.5 WAR player next year (if healthy) with a chance for more. That's a 4+ WAR swing at a position where our internal candidates were Mike Olt & Matt Davidson. Hard to be upset about that if the price is secondary prospects given the scarcity of 3B in the majors. Will still need find a legit impact bat to pair with Abreu if we're serious about improving the offense though.
-
QUOTE (dpd9189 @ Dec 8, 2015 -> 10:31 PM) Bruce Levine @MLBBruceLevine 34m34 minutes ago Cubs not done yet according to source . Big time outfielder next ? Hayward -Gordan - Car Go ? Not to be the spelling police here, but did Levine actually botch both of those names.
-
Something has to go down tonight. It's been way too quiet on the Sox front.
-
QUOTE (fathom @ Dec 8, 2015 -> 09:40 PM) He's supposedly their fallback option if they can't get Heyward Where you hearing this?
-
ATL got a great package for Miller, but the Sox are better off waiting until next offseason before consider moving Quintana or Sale IMO. The free agent market is significantly worse next year and these guys will still have three & four years of control respectively. Plus we'll have a much better idea where we stand in a year (does Rodon take that next step, are guys like Anderson/Fulmer legit pieces) and dead weight off our roster (LaRoche/Danks).
-
QUOTE (fathom @ Dec 8, 2015 -> 07:16 PM) Baez They're most likely going to move him.
-
That's a pretty decent deal for the Cubs. The fourth year sucks, but a $14M AAV ain't bad.
-
Mike Leake: Nationals new favorite
Chicago White Sox replied to Bigsoxhurt35's topic in Pale Hose Talk
Leaks has to be one of the most over-rated starters in baseball. -
T Flow to Atlanta (2yr 5M + 3rdYr Option)
Chicago White Sox replied to Dick Allen's topic in Pale Hose Talk
QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Dec 8, 2015 -> 06:21 PM) John Hart must have a White Sox hard on like KW had for old Indians. AJP, Beckham, Swisher, and now T Flow 2 years $5 million with some incentives. Well that clearly shows how his pitch framing is valued around the league and why we had to non-tender him. -
QUOTE (nitetrain8601 @ Dec 8, 2015 -> 06:18 PM) Dodgers trade: Yasiel Puig Julio Urias Joc Pederson Dodgers receive: Jose Fernandez Adam LaRoche John Danks Marlins trade Marcelo Ozuna Jose Fernandez Marlins receive: Julio Urias Carlos Rodon White Sox trade: Carlos Rodon Adam LaRoche John Danks White Sox Receive Yasiel Puig Marcelo Ozuna Joc Pederson Thoughts?? Why are we trading for three OFs?
-
QUOTE (WhiteSoxLifer @ Dec 8, 2015 -> 06:02 PM) White Sox spent a portion of the day talking internally about lining up a series of possible moves. Things could start to heat up. https://twitter.com/ChuckGarfien/status/674377097708765184 This may be thread worthy.
-
If offers are similar, I don't see how he doesn't pick the Cubs. He used to play for Maddon and is an Illinois native. Plus the flight from Chicago is a bit shorter to Nashville than the one from New York. Seems like a no-doubter to me.
-
QUOTE (bmags @ Dec 7, 2015 -> 10:52 PM) Depends what we mean by contend. It would probably get us to 83-84 wins. How do you figure? Upton & Frazier combined for 8 WAR last year, they'd be replacing guys who put up a -3 WAR. That's an 11 point swing right there (assuming production maintains). Doesn't include any improvement from Melky or LaRoche, who combined for -1.7 WAR, which is incredibly likely IMO. Also doesn't consider any improvement from any of our the young guys, in particular Rodon, who has plenty of room to improve over the 2.1 WAR he posted last year. With a couple significant upgrades at 3B & RF, this team could very easily be a legitimate playoff contender.
-
QUOTE (nitetrain8601 @ Dec 7, 2015 -> 10:31 PM) IMO, the Sox are too many impact pieces away. Unless you are able to acquire two power hitters at least, this team will have a hard time competing. Sign Upton, trade for Frazier and we could have a pretty damn good offense. 1. Eaton, CF 2. Johnson, 2B 3. Abreu, 1B 4. Upton, RF 5. Cabrera, LF 6. Frazier, 3B 7. LaRoche, DH 8. Avila, C 9. Saladino, SS IF: Sanchez OF: Thompson UT: ?? BC: Navarro
-
QUOTE (WhiteSoxLifer @ Dec 7, 2015 -> 08:13 AM) Yes and Donaldson is going to be getting over 10 million next year. A's can't afford that. Do you have a crystal ball to know how the prospect are going to turn out. Again they are probably going to trade Lawrie which now turns into more prospects for Donaldson. Sox made at stupid trade for shark. Traded 4 players for one year rental which was a bad overall deal plus if they magical sign a player with QO then they get nothing for shark. Just stop, the A's just gave a 35 year old reliever over $7M/year, they easily could have found a way to afford Donaldson. It was horrible trade at the time (short of a Lawrie breakout) and it remains a horrible trade in hindsight.
-
White Sox targeting OF Justin Upton
Chicago White Sox replied to GGajewski18's topic in Pale Hose Talk
QUOTE (Y2JImmy0 @ Dec 7, 2015 -> 07:36 AM) I have been one of the biggest detractors to giving up draft picks of any kind. I feel like if they were going to do this they should have just traded Shark. I am draft fan and some of it is me selfishly wanting to be entertained on draft night. If the White Sox gave up a pick in the 20's for Ian Desmond or Daniel Murphy I'd be furious. I don't think anyone should be upset for doing it for Upton though. Upton was a 3.6 WAR player last year playing in the Cavernous PetCo Park. He would immediately upgrade the White Sox biggest area of need (RF) with a 28 power bat. If they are willing to spend, he's probably the guy. The benefits to having the draft pick are more related to flexibility in my opinion than the actual player taken. The player taken with the 25th pick in the draft will probably never be as good as Upton. It's not that simple though. If the Sox have 3 picks on the first night of June's draft, I'll be happy about it. If Justin Upton is the White Sox starting RF on Opening Day though, I'd be happy about that too. This I 100% agree. All else being equal, I want to keep the pick for the reasons you mentioned. Having said that, if a guy on the right side of 30 is available and can fill a major need for the next 5 years, then I'm totally cool with sacrificing it. -
White Sox targeting OF Justin Upton
Chicago White Sox replied to GGajewski18's topic in Pale Hose Talk
QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Dec 7, 2015 -> 06:31 AM) I think they have more money to play with than a lot of people want to assume. Some current players are getting increases, but between the 2 catchers signing and the players who are now off the books, Samedzija, Alexei, Beckham. Soto, Bonafacio, Keppinger, Noeisi, Guerra, Flowers they are at about -$30 million from last year before those increases. When they acquired Samardzija, they wanted to sign him long term, so they had to have funds available. I don't know why you and at least one other poster assumes no way over $120 million. They were at $119 last year, and payroll usually goes up. Yep, no one here has any idea what our payroll will be next year, but the Upton rumor suggests it might be a lot higher than most people here are expecting. Also, for those people against signing Upton because of the QO, how do you expect to add an impact otherwise? We don't any prospects in the system that are even close to being options and trade candidates are going to cost a lot more than a draft pick. I get it sucks to lose the pick, but from a talent perspective, it's probably one of the cheaper ways to add an impact bat. -
White Sox targeting OF Justin Upton
Chicago White Sox replied to GGajewski18's topic in Pale Hose Talk
QUOTE (GreenSox @ Dec 6, 2015 -> 09:44 PM) I'm okay with Upton if they get rid of Melky and trade Eaton. Avi-Trayce-Upton is a much better OF. Much rather sign Upton than trade young players to rent an overrated fraud like Frazier. Lol...only you would want to sign Upton and then trade Eaton to clear room for Trayce & Avi. What an absolutely horrible, nonsensical idea. -
QUOTE (Vance Law @ Dec 6, 2015 -> 08:31 PM) Please no. Cincy will get a big package of prospects for him from someone. He's only around for 2 seasons. This is the exact opposite of the sort of thing we should do. 2 years and very likely a comp pick if he leaves. If we can get him without giving up Anderson or Fulmer, then I'm all for it.
-
Do GMs arrive in Nashville tonight? If so, we could have some late night activity.
-
QUOTE (shysocks @ Dec 4, 2015 -> 03:34 PM) I don't have time to address the framing argument any further at the moment, although I wish I did because it's a great discussion. But as I posted in the other thread about Flowers' non-tender, people saying his hitting was trash are just simply not paying attention to the rest of the league. He struck out a lot. His ceiling was low. And I'd love to be able to describe the Sox' primary catcher as something more than "average for his league." But his numbers match up closely with the aggregate totals for catchers in the American League, except his rotten 2013. Go look it up for yourself. Flowers was ranked 21 of 28 in wRC+ for catchers with 300+ PAs. He wasn't a good hitter last year, even for a catcher. And this is a great example of why people must look beyond a player's stats in isolation and consider the big picture. Flowers is a low contact hitter who frequently goes extended cold streaks where he provides no value offensively. He's a guy who is far less effective than his wRC+ would suggest because he actually hurts the ability of the players batting around him to produce and ultimately makes our run distribution more variable and therefore less valuable. Not all runs all created equal and he's a perfect example of why. His hitting is trash and the single reason he had to go.
-
I'm cool with Navarro over Flowers for next year, but these moves put us in a dangerous spot at catcher for 2017. We should still try to add a prospect at the AA or AAA level that can potentially compete for a starting in the near future.
-
White Sox decline to tender Tyler Flowers and Jacob Turner
Chicago White Sox replied to Baron's topic in Pale Hose Talk
QUOTE (Harry Chappas @ Dec 2, 2015 -> 11:32 PM) Spot on Pitch framing is an over blown stat almost as much as babip Am I wrong, I could be but a top flight pitch framer gets one more called strike game? Why is BABIP overblown? -
Dude sucks, Hahn should be fired on the spot if he were to sign this chump.
