oldsox Posted May 17, 2017 Share Posted May 17, 2017 QUOTE (fathom @ May 16, 2017 -> 07:48 PM) Rockies for Rodgers + is my hope Rodgers makes sense. After missing first 2-3 weeks of season, he now has slash line of 405/422/655/1077 in High A. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
turnin' two Posted May 17, 2017 Share Posted May 17, 2017 QUOTE (shipps @ May 16, 2017 -> 02:26 PM) So let me get this straight. Everyone wants the Cubs three best prospects in return and are a no on Schwarber? "Babe" has a career slash line of .149/.260/.276 against lefties. Still not a ton of PA, but the reality may be that he is a platoon player. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reiks12 Posted May 17, 2017 Share Posted May 17, 2017 QUOTE (oldsox @ May 16, 2017 -> 08:16 PM) Rodgers makes sense. After missing first 2-3 weeks of season, he now has slash line of 405/422/655/1077 in High A. a trade with the rockies would be great. We match up well.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldsox Posted May 17, 2017 Share Posted May 17, 2017 QUOTE (oldsox @ May 16, 2017 -> 08:16 PM) Rodgers makes sense. After missing first 2-3 weeks of season, he now has slash line of 405/422/655/1077 in High A. Well, I jinxed young Mr. Rodgers. As soon as I said something nice about him, he goes 0 for 5 with 4 K's. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YouCanPutItOnTheBoardYES! Posted May 17, 2017 Share Posted May 17, 2017 QUOTE (IowaSoxFan @ May 16, 2017 -> 05:21 PM) I think the bidding for Q will come down to the Cubs and Cards. Both have a need at SP and cost controlled SP at that. I don't see the Nats doing much to their rotation as they are likely to run away with that division in the second half and with all the injuries the Mets have, it doesn't make a lot of sense for them to be chasing a pennant this season. It doesn't make sense for them to chase a title now considering Harper will walk after 2018? I don't get that logic at all. If anything they should do whatever they can possibly do now to win this year and next. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted May 17, 2017 Share Posted May 17, 2017 QUOTE (ChiSoxFanMike @ May 17, 2017 -> 09:04 AM) It doesn't make sense for them to chase a title now considering Harper will walk after 2018? I don't get that logic at all. If anything they should do whatever they can possibly do now to win this year and next. Yeah I don't understand that that logic either. But I do agree with him that I think Nats will be interested in Q but will shy away from the price (likely a lot of teams will). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harfman77 Posted May 17, 2017 Author Share Posted May 17, 2017 QUOTE (ChiSoxFanMike @ May 17, 2017 -> 09:04 AM) It doesn't make sense for them to chase a title now considering Harper will walk after 2018? I don't get that logic at all. If anything they should do whatever they can possibly do now to win this year and next. It doesn't make sense for the Mets. The Nats likely aren't going to need the help with how weak their division is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YouCanPutItOnTheBoardYES! Posted May 17, 2017 Share Posted May 17, 2017 QUOTE (IowaSoxFan @ May 17, 2017 -> 09:24 AM) It doesn't make sense for the Mets. The Nats likely aren't going to need the help with how weak their division is. Ah I see. I misread your post. But still, I think the Nationals will be buyers. They'll likely run away in the East but their bullpen is nowhere near playoff caliber. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
striker Posted May 17, 2017 Share Posted May 17, 2017 QUOTE (fathom @ May 16, 2017 -> 08:48 PM) Rockies for Rodgers + is my hope Quintana + Jones for Dahl, Rodgers, Hoffman, Almonte, Pedro Gonzalez. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lip Man 1 Posted May 17, 2017 Share Posted May 17, 2017 QUOTE (striker @ May 17, 2017 -> 09:44 AM) Quintana + Jones for Dahl, Rodgers, Hoffman, Almonte, Pedro Gonzalez. To me that's an interesting trade proposal, of course Jones has to return and pitch well. No idea if that will happen for him or not this year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Chappas Posted May 17, 2017 Share Posted May 17, 2017 You add some bullpen arms to a Q deal and you can end up with a better package than you got for Sale. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxjusttyped Posted May 17, 2017 Share Posted May 17, 2017 QUOTE (striker @ May 17, 2017 -> 10:44 AM) Quintana + Jones for Dahl, Rodgers, Hoffman, Almonte, Pedro Gonzalez. Here's Dave Cameron's response to your proposal: Dave Cameron 12:04 I wouldn't take that if I was the White Sox. That's an injured maybe average player, an overrated prospect, an okay pitching prospect, and some stuff. They could do better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiSox59 Posted May 17, 2017 Share Posted May 17, 2017 QUOTE (striker @ May 17, 2017 -> 10:44 AM) Quintana + Jones for Dahl, Rodgers, Hoffman, Almonte, Pedro Gonzalez. This would get me very excited. Which means it probably isn't possible. To get Dahl, Rodgers and Hoffman alone would be pretty fantastic. But to add more interesting pieces? Probably a pipe dream. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yesterday333 Posted May 17, 2017 Share Posted May 17, 2017 QUOTE (maxjusttyped @ May 17, 2017 -> 10:26 AM) Here's Dave Cameron's response to your proposal: I was kinda thinking the same thing. I think you've got to get Tapia and/or Mcmahon in there as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OmarComing25 Posted May 17, 2017 Share Posted May 17, 2017 (edited) I'm not that high on Rodgers so I wouldn't be that excited about that package. His home parks in both Asheville (Low A) and Lancaster (High A) are bigger hitter parks than Coors is, and his road numbers are pedestrian at best. Plus doesn't he have questionable defense? I agree with Cameron that he's overrated. Edited May 17, 2017 by OmarComing25 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted May 17, 2017 Share Posted May 17, 2017 I still want do deal with the Yankees. I didn't think it was likely since I didn't think the Yankees would be as competitive as they are (still time to flame out) but they should be interesting to follow over the next 2 months. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiSox59 Posted May 17, 2017 Share Posted May 17, 2017 QUOTE (maxjusttyped @ May 17, 2017 -> 11:26 AM) Here's Dave Cameron's response to your proposal: Hmm. Interesting comment. Seems to downplay Rodgers and Dahl a bit, but I guess that is promising. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted May 17, 2017 Share Posted May 17, 2017 QUOTE (OmarComing25 @ May 17, 2017 -> 11:48 AM) I'm not that high on Rodgers so I wouldn't be that excited about that package. His home parks in both Asheville (Low A) and Lancaster (High A) are bigger hitter parks than Coors is, and his road numbers are pedestrian at best. Plus doesn't he have questionable defense? I agree with Cameron that he's overrated. I don't know. Rodgers has good power potential to move to 3b, which is something that people were not sure of with Swanson/Bregman. I'd probably take that deal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldsox Posted May 17, 2017 Share Posted May 17, 2017 QUOTE (IowaSoxFan @ May 17, 2017 -> 09:24 AM) It doesn't make sense for the Mets. The Nats likely aren't going to need the help with how weak their division is. Was it just two years ago when Nats blew a big lead and fell out of playoffs? They should make a bullpen trade with someone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted May 17, 2017 Share Posted May 17, 2017 QUOTE (oldsox @ May 17, 2017 -> 12:04 PM) Was it just two years ago when Nats blew a big lead and fell out of playoffs? They should make a bullpen trade with someone. I think he was talking about in means of dealing the farm for someone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackSox13 Posted May 17, 2017 Share Posted May 17, 2017 QUOTE (yesterday333 @ May 17, 2017 -> 11:43 AM) I was kinda thinking the same thing. I think you've got to get Tapia and/or Mcmahon in there as well. Ya know, at first I kinda giggled ( shame on me) when you mentioned McMahon because he was no better than Trey last season. Then I looked up McMahon to see what he's doing this year and was surprised. Looks like he's adjusted to AA well this year, much better numbers than 2016. If he continues to hit he should make it AAA at some point this summer. Good call. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
striker Posted May 17, 2017 Share Posted May 17, 2017 QUOTE (OmarComing25 @ May 17, 2017 -> 12:48 PM) I'm not that high on Rodgers so I wouldn't be that excited about that package. His home parks in both Asheville (Low A) and Lancaster (High A) are bigger hitter parks than Coors is, and his road numbers are pedestrian at best. Plus doesn't he have questionable defense? I agree with Cameron that he's overrated. Rockies have their own risks they'll be inheriting, a poor performing Quintana and an injury risk in Jones. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted May 17, 2017 Share Posted May 17, 2017 (edited) "Red-hot Astros remain aggressive in their search for more pitching." http://www.foxsports.com/mlb/story/houston...osenthal-051717 Edited May 17, 2017 by soxfan2014 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackSox13 Posted May 17, 2017 Share Posted May 17, 2017 I like Rosenthal rumors. Houston and Pitt match up well for trade partners so who knows. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted May 17, 2017 Share Posted May 17, 2017 Would love to see Cooper fix Matt Harvey after we dump Hollland/MiGo/Shields. Probably won't happen. But at least it would be entertaining. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.