southsider2k5 Posted July 16, 2015 Share Posted July 16, 2015 QUOTE (Chicago White Sox @ Jul 15, 2015 -> 09:05 PM) I think you're reading too much into this. Guerra was called up and basically rotted in the bullpen for a few weeks, Beck had one spot start when Erik wasn't available (would've had to pitch on two days rest), & Montas is getting the call once again when Erik isn't an option. IMO, Johnson is clearly the guy pegged for a rotation spot. They've been monitoring his innings very closely as of late, even skipping a recent start. IMO, that tells me they're expecting/hoping the guy will be needed in the majors in the very near future. Johnson was involved in the AAA ASG. If they wanted him here, he would be here. Pitching against the team they are chasing in the division, they are looking to bring up the guys that give them the best chance to win a game, and are not worried about a AAA scrimmage game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shysocks Posted July 16, 2015 Share Posted July 16, 2015 QUOTE (Chicago White Sox @ Jul 15, 2015 -> 09:05 PM) I think you're reading too much into this. Guerra was called up and basically rotted in the bullpen for a few weeks, Beck had one spot start when Erik wasn't available (would've had to pitch on two days rest), & Montas is getting the call once again when Erik isn't an option. IMO, Johnson is clearly the guy pegged for a rotation spot. They've been monitoring his innings very closely as of late, even skipping a recent start. IMO, that tells me they're expecting/hoping the guy will be needed in the majors in the very near future. This is how I've read it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted July 16, 2015 Share Posted July 16, 2015 Chicago White Sox @whitesox 8m8 minutes ago Chicago, IL For those asking about rotation: Samardzija and Danks tomorrow (in that order), Quintana Saturday. No confirmation for Sunday yet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiSox59 Posted July 16, 2015 Share Posted July 16, 2015 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Jul 16, 2015 -> 11:11 AM) Chicago White Sox @whitesox 8m8 minutes ago Chicago, IL For those asking about rotation: Samardzija and Danks tomorrow (in that order), Quintana Saturday. No confirmation for Sunday yet. There is no way Sale doesn't go Sunday. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whisox05 Posted July 16, 2015 Share Posted July 16, 2015 QUOTE (ChiSox59 @ Jul 16, 2015 -> 11:23 AM) There is no way Sale doesn't go Sunday. Maybe he's getting traded lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted July 16, 2015 Share Posted July 16, 2015 If the Sox potentially see him as a reliever long-term, maybe other teams do too. What if the Sox were showcasing him to package him with Samardzija to a team that needs a starter and another reliever? That would certainly have to interest Houston and Toronto into giving something real up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted July 17, 2015 Share Posted July 17, 2015 QUOTE (soxfan2014 @ Jul 16, 2015 -> 07:45 PM) If the Sox potentially see him as a reliever long-term, maybe other teams do too. What if the Sox were showcasing him to package him with Samardzija to a team that needs a starter and another reliever? That would certainly have to interest Houston and Toronto into giving something real up. If I'm trading with the White Sox and I"m in competition, I would very, very much prefer to trade for Putnam or Petricka rather than Montas. Or if you're that desperate for a closer, Robertson. Get someone who is at least partially proven. Why would a team in contention trading for Samardzija want to break in a rookie over the last 2 months of the season? I mean, it worked for Jenks but seriously? And the White Sox, if they're trading people away, would be silly to trade away guys they control for 6.5 years. What are they going to get back that makes them younger and more long-term set up than a guy they already control? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flavum Posted July 17, 2015 Share Posted July 17, 2015 Hahn on the Score at 835am tomorrow. I'm sure he'll talk a little Montas and other stuff. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCCWS Posted July 17, 2015 Share Posted July 17, 2015 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Jul 16, 2015 -> 08:11 PM) If I'm trading with the White Sox and I"m in competition, I would very, very much prefer to trade for Putnam or Petricka rather than Montas. Or if you're that desperate for a closer, Robertson. Get someone who is at least partially proven. Why would a team in contention trading for Samardzija want to break in a rookie over the last 2 months of the season? I mean, it worked for Jenks but seriously? And the White Sox, if they're trading people away, would be silly to trade away guys they control for 6.5 years. What are they going to get back that makes them younger and more long-term set up than a guy they already control? I don't think he is being showcased either. But you can look at it another way. A team in contention may be reluctant to give up a top prospect( 1-3 in their system) for a 2 month rental. But trading a top prospect for a 2 month rental plus a young pitcher a couple years away may be more palatable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreenSox Posted July 17, 2015 Share Posted July 17, 2015 QUOTE (soxfan2014 @ Jul 16, 2015 -> 06:45 PM) If the Sox potentially see him as a reliever long-term, maybe other teams do too. What if the Sox were showcasing him to package him with Samardzija to a team that needs a starter and another reliever? That would certainly have to interest Houston and Toronto into giving something real up. A couple of appearances won't prove anything one way or the other. Sox have plenty of effective relievers to trade. He's a top 100 prospect- not the guy to trade. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quin Posted July 17, 2015 Share Posted July 17, 2015 QUOTE (SCCWS @ Jul 16, 2015 -> 07:27 PM) I don't think he is being showcased either. But you can look at it another way. A team in contention may be reluctant to give up a top prospect( 1-3 in their system) for a 2 month rental. But trading a top prospect for a 2 month rental plus a young pitcher a couple years away may be more palatable. If I'm sending out Shark and Montas I want a Top 10 prospect. No point in trading a comp + Montas for just any org's 1-3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knightni Posted July 17, 2015 Share Posted July 17, 2015 Another theory. They're trying out Montas on MLB pitching to see how he holds his own. If he does well, they'll try him out in the closer role and move Robertson to a contender before the deadline. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDF Posted July 17, 2015 Share Posted July 17, 2015 QUOTE (knightni @ Jul 17, 2015 -> 12:14 PM) Another theory. They're trying out Montas on MLB pitching to see how he holds his own. If he does well, they'll try him out in the closer role and move Robertson to a contender before the deadline. interesting. but after thinking about it, while it is a great idea, i would be hesitant to pull it off. Robertson is an established cl with a track record. Montas will be rookie. then again, how do the sox fill those holes that they are missing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knightni Posted July 17, 2015 Share Posted July 17, 2015 QUOTE (LDF @ Jul 17, 2015 -> 08:19 AM) interesting. but after thinking about it, while it is a great idea, i would be hesitant to pull it off. Robertson is an established cl with a track record. Montas will be rookie. then again, how do the sox fill those holes that they are missing. The team is not contending and doesn't need to pay a vet to close. To quote Tyler Perry, "I can do bad all by myself." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDF Posted July 17, 2015 Share Posted July 17, 2015 QUOTE (knightni @ Jul 17, 2015 -> 12:20 PM) The team is not contending and doesn't need to pay a vet to close. To quote Tyler Perry, "I can do bad all by myself." don't get me wrong on that, i can see the reasons. but Robertson has proven himself and there is always going to be next yr. any way, that logic i bolded can be held for any play on the sox. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCCWS Posted July 17, 2015 Share Posted July 17, 2015 QUOTE (Quinarvy @ Jul 16, 2015 -> 08:30 PM) If I'm sending out Shark and Montas I want a Top 10 prospect. No point in trading a comp + Montas for just any org's 1-3 I would actually spread it to top 20 if it was a C-SS-CF. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted July 17, 2015 Share Posted July 17, 2015 QUOTE (knightni @ Jul 17, 2015 -> 07:14 AM) Another theory. They're trying out Montas on MLB pitching to see how he holds his own. If he does well, they'll try him out in the closer role and move Robertson to a contender before the deadline. That would be huge. I'm open to trading Robertson to shed the salary. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackSox13 Posted July 17, 2015 Share Posted July 17, 2015 Entertaining the idea of trading Robertson, what contenders need a closer? I'm going to go and look around and see. Not for or against the idea, just open minded. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flavum Posted July 17, 2015 Share Posted July 17, 2015 (edited) QUOTE (flavum @ Jul 16, 2015 -> 07:22 PM) Hahn on the Score at 835am tomorrow. I'm sure he'll talk a little Montas and other stuff. No Montas talk, but they did manage to keep the Kenny/Rick "Who's in charge" topic going...boring. Also Hahn doesn't know teams play 19 games against teams in the division, which scares me a little. You didn't miss anything. Edited July 17, 2015 by flavum Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldsox Posted July 17, 2015 Share Posted July 17, 2015 QUOTE (soxfan2014 @ Jul 17, 2015 -> 07:05 AM) That would be huge. I'm open to trading Robertson to shed the salary. Disagree. Robertson still a good closer, even though he cost Sale a win. If he goes, how many wins will the new guy cost? I don't want to read about it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted July 17, 2015 Share Posted July 17, 2015 If I am reading this correctly, that means another move it still to come, plus another for the 26th man. Stay tuned. Chicago White Sox @whitesox 1m1 minute ago Chicago, IL White Sox have recalled right-handed pitcher @frankmontas from @BhamBarons. Montas will be active for both games. Montas will wear No. 60. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flavum Posted July 17, 2015 Share Posted July 17, 2015 I believe the rule is (and I could be wrong)... If the rescheduled doubleheader is the day after the rainout, the 26th man is only eligible for the 2nd game because travel may play a factor for one team and not the other. If the rescheduled doubleheader is far in the future (like today), the 26th man is eligible both games. So I think Montas is the 26th man, eligible for both games, and he'll be returned to Birmingham after tonight. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YouCanPutItOnTheBoardYES! Posted July 17, 2015 Share Posted July 17, 2015 QUOTE (knightni @ Jul 17, 2015 -> 07:14 AM) Another theory. They're trying out Montas on MLB pitching to see how he holds his own. If he does well, they'll try him out in the closer role and move Robertson to a contender before the deadline. No one will take on Robertson's contract unless the Sox pick up most up the money. That's not worth it. The Sox should keep him for now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiSox59 Posted July 17, 2015 Share Posted July 17, 2015 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Jul 17, 2015 -> 09:26 AM) If I am reading this correctly, that means another move it still to come, plus another for the 26th man. Stay tuned. Chicago White Sox @whitesox 1m1 minute ago Chicago, IL White Sox have recalled right-handed pitcher @frankmontas from @BhamBarons. Montas will be active for both games. Montas will wear No. 60. How do you read that as two moves still to come? Isn't the 26th man always active for both games? What about that tweet makes you think Montas isn't the 26th man (in addition to another move)? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiSox59 Posted July 17, 2015 Share Posted July 17, 2015 QUOTE (Mike F. @ Jul 17, 2015 -> 09:29 AM) No one will take on Robertson's contract unless the Sox pick up most up the money. That's not worth it. The Sox should keep him for now. Doubt that is true. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.