Jump to content

3/13 vs Diamondbacks


flavum
 Share

Recommended Posts

QUOTE (Lillian @ Mar 13, 2016 -> 02:43 PM)
How was Danks' velocity? That is the big question for me. If he can get that fast ball back into the low 90's he should be effective. His change up has

become a solid pitch.

Half of his change ups hang up high and get crushed though. If it's low and fading it's a great pitch, but Danks has shaky control and his lack of velocity makes it pretty easy to wait on that change and crush it when he hangs it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Knackattack @ Mar 13, 2016 -> 06:49 PM)
Half of his change ups hang up high and get crushed though. If it's low and fading it's a great pitch, but Danks has shaky control and his lack of velocity makes it pretty easy to wait on that change and crush it when he hangs it

This seems like the kind of thing that would be worse early in the year in Arizona than later in the year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Knackattack @ Mar 13, 2016 -> 04:49 PM)
Half of his change ups hang up high and get crushed though. If it's low and fading it's a great pitch, but Danks has shaky control and his lack of velocity makes it pretty easy to wait on that change and crush it when he hangs it

The problem is batters can sit on his fastball outside too because he's never gonna bust anybody inside. He's always seemed like a 2 pitch guy to me. Not enough weapons at that low velocity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (elrockinMT @ Mar 13, 2016 -> 05:33 PM)
Last time I heard it was still spring training. You can't hang your hat on games like this

 

Yes you can. Let's not pretend like we haven't seen this from Danks since his shoulder was operated on. At this point we are all praying that somehow he magically finds "it" and is good again. The likelihood of that is not good

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ Mar 13, 2016 -> 07:59 PM)
Yes you can. Let's not pretend like we haven't seen this from Danks since his shoulder was operated on. At this point we are all praying that somehow he magically finds "it" and is good again. The likelihood of that is not good

 

 

Somebody should have told Hahn that since he didn't bring in his replacement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ Mar 13, 2016 -> 08:04 PM)
Yes he did, it's between Latos, Turner and EJ

 

Sounds like you agree. Hahn assumed all along that Danks is the 4th starter. He brought in insurance for EJ not Danks

 

 

Hahn said the Sox plan to go with Erik Johnson, along with their four returning left-handed starters.

 

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/colum...125-column.html

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (SCCWS @ Mar 13, 2016 -> 08:10 PM)
Sounds like you agree. Hahn assumed all along that Danks is the 4th starter. He brought in insurance for EJ not Danks

 

 

Hahn said the Sox plan to go with Erik Johnson, along with their four returning left-handed starters.

 

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/colum...125-column.html

 

 

He's lying. They didn't pay Latos $3 million to not be in the rotation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (caulfield12 @ Mar 13, 2016 -> 08:56 PM)
But didn't they also give Turner something like $2.5 million?

 

More "insurance" guys now. Which is better than the last couple of years at least when Carroll was one of the top options, along with Noesi.

 

$1.5m

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (reiks12 @ Mar 14, 2016 -> 02:37 AM)
Very worried about our 4 and 5. Hopefully Danks and Co. can get back on track and not destroy our bullpen.

 

same here about Danks. who else does the sox have that can be hopefully counted on, that is on the team now... EJ eh no.....

Edited by LDF
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ Mar 13, 2016 -> 05:59 PM)
Yes you can. Let's not pretend like we haven't seen this from Danks since his shoulder was operated on. At this point we are all praying that somehow he magically finds "it" and is good again. The likelihood of that is not good

This is exactly the problem I see too. All the same people are using the same excuses of just being spring training, but for players such as Danks there should be no "just wait and see" approach. Weren't we supposed to give him time to heal from said injury before we could accurately asses him? This team cannot afford yet another typical early season bed wetting. And if Danks is being himself by May/June and we're competing, it's time to consider reassigning hos role.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Flash Tizzle @ Mar 14, 2016 -> 12:56 AM)
This is exactly the problem I see too. All the same people are using the same excuses of just being spring training, but for players such as Danks there should be no "just wait and see" approach. Weren't we supposed to give him time to heal from said injury before we could accurately asses him? This team cannot afford yet another typical early season bed wetting. And if Danks is being himself by May/June and we're competing, it's time to consider reassigning hos role.

Having players peak the first couple weeks of spring training, especially pitchers, isn't exactly a great strategy. Danks is Danks. He'll be what he's been. Erik Johnson as well. Sure they may suck, but they don't have to be Cy Young candidates to do their job. There's a reason teams are hitting over .300 as a team right now even playing players who will not see the major leagues. The pitchers aren't ready, the fields are hard, the air is thin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...