I believe so yes

 

I highly doubt Millar has any inside scoops on anything

Ok cool. They normally invite insiders on there but I wasnt paying attention to who was talking.

Rumors they may look to move an OF to make room for Trumbo.

 

Side note: trumbo in coors would be awesome.

And looking for a TOR starter.

 

I dunno if tonight is going to be nuts or if it'll be dead.

I'd aim for a bigger return than that. Quintana should return nearly the same value as sale did, especially due to the fourth year of control.

 

That's 3 top 100 prospects and Stubbs/Laureno being much better prospects than the 4th from Boston.

Quintana deal starts with Rogers, then add in 2-3 more (Tapia, Hoffman/Pint/Freeland, McMahon/Dom Nunez?) Not familiar at all with their prospects.

Quintana deal starts with Rogers, then add in 2-3 more (Tapia, Hoffman/Pint/Freeland, McMahon/Dom Nunez?) Not familiar at all with their prospects.

 

I would think Rodgers is an untouchable for the Rockies.

Quintana deal starts with Rogers, then add in 2-3 more (Tapia, Hoffman/Pint/Freeland, McMahon/Dom Nunez?) Not familiar at all with their prospects.

 

If you get Rodgers/Hoffman, doubt you get much more on tail.

Also Baron thank you for filling me in. I had to catch up on work and then there wa slike 500 tweets and I couldn't figure anything out.

I would think Rodgers is an untouchable for the Rockies.

 

Perhaps, but we thought Moncada and Lopez were untouchable.

 

Plus Rodgers is blocked for the time being. Rox infield is stacked.

I would think Rodgers is an untouchable for the Rockies.

 

Well to be fair, so was Moncada. They HAVE to get Rodgers.

I would think Rodgers is an untouchable for the Rockies.

 

Why? He's so far away from the bigs. I would want a lot more from Colorado if he's the top guy they offer.

If you get Rodgers/Hoffman, doubt you get much more on tail.

 

 

Well ya just threw in some names that caught my eye.

If we don't get position players, 75 wins is going to be a successful season for this franchise.

What planet do you live on?

Well ya just threw in some names that caught my eye.

 

Well, it will not be the depth. We now know that there IS a pull of quantity v. quality. And getting Rodgers back means not much more than that will return.

 

I like the prestige of Reed but his cup of tea did scare me (and he had two). I'd be fine sox going after Tucker as their main piece from Houston and getting 3-4 of their low a level guys.

 

But Tucker/Fisher/Stubbs seems very doable. Reed/Tucker/Stubbs realistic.

How serious do you guys think the Yankees would be for a Q trade? I mean, are they going to be going for it or are they trying to build up that farm rather then selling off part of the farm?

If you get Rodgers/Hoffman, doubt you get much more on tail.

 

Rodgers had an .821 OPS in A ball. I like that he's only 20 and looks ready for AA, but we're talking about Jose Quintana here. You should be getting 4 or 5 players of Rodgers quality or thereabouts for him.

How serious do you guys think the Yankees would be for a Q trade? I mean, are they going to be going for it or are they trying to build up that farm rather then selling off part of the farm?

 

I think some of it depends on if they sign Chapman. If they sign Chappy and then pivot to EE, they could be good again in a hurry, in which case Q makes sense.

I think some of it depends on if they sign Chapman. If they sign Chappy and then pivot to EE, they could be good again in a hurry, in which case Q makes sense.

 

Hopefully Chapman and EE get figured out soon. I'd imagine they want to leave the winter meetings knowing who they're going to be playing for.

I think some of it depends on if they sign Chapman. If they sign Chappy and then pivot to EE, they could be good again in a hurry, in which case Q makes sense.

 

Amusingly, trading Sale to the Red Sox would boost Q's value to the Yankees.

Rodgers had an .821 OPS in A ball. I like that he's only 20 and looks ready for AA, but we're talking about Jose Quintana here. You should be getting 4 or 5 players of Rodgers quality or thereabouts for him.

 

Rodgers is 20 years old and had 31 doubles and 19 home runs. He is by all accounts an elite, elite prospect and would look very nice at 3B in the future for us. You didn't get 4 or 5 Moncadas for Sale, did you? Why would you get 4 or 5 Rodgers for Q? Rodgers is a top 10 prospect in all of baseball. Rodgers + 2 or 3 guys gets it done.

Edited December 8, 20169 yr by Ro Da Don

Also Baron thank you for filling me in. I had to catch up on work and then there wa slike 500 tweets and I couldn't figure anything out.

 

No problem

Rodgers is 20 years old and had 31 doubles and 19 home runs. He is by all accounts an elite, elite prospect and would look very nice at 3B in the future for us. You didn't get 4 or 5 Moncadas for Sale, did you? Why would you get 4 or 5 Rodgers for Q? Rodgers is a top 10 prospect in all of baseball. Rodgers + 2 or 3 guys gets it done.

Yeah, I want either Rodgers or Bregman for Q, otherwise I am fine holding steady for now.

 

 

Rodgers had an .821 OPS in A ball. I like that he's only 20 and looks ready for AA, but we're talking about Jose Quintana here. You should be getting 4 or 5 players of Rodgers quality or thereabouts for him.

 

Guys, we've had 2 trades now, and none of these fantasy "BEST PROSPECT PLUS REST OF FARM" deals were close, and instead we've gotten the top player people wanted and have been fine.

 

If we leave a deal with Quintana with Rodgers, people will be losing their damn minds in excitement.

Yeah, I want either Rodgers or Bregman for Q, otherwise I am fine holding steady for now.

 

Except Bregman was in the Majors and Rodgers was in A ball. They wouldn't budge on Bregman for Sale, why would they for Q? Rodgers will be where Bregman is now, in 2 years. I'm happy with Rodgers+++ or Tucker+++ (I'm very high on Tucker). Slightly would prefer Rodgers but I think Tucker ends up as a phenomenal hitter.

Perhaps, but we thought Moncada and Lopez were untouchable.

 

Plus Rodgers is blocked for the time being. Rox infield is stacked.

 

I don't recall anyone saying Lopez was untouchable.