flavum Posted December 7, 2016 Share Posted December 7, 2016 Give me Heyman and Rosenthal or give me death. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quin Posted December 7, 2016 Share Posted December 7, 2016 QUOTE (Baron @ Dec 7, 2016 -> 05:57 PM) Who? But best match I see is Cubs write for Sports Mockery Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigsoxhurt35 Posted December 7, 2016 Share Posted December 7, 2016 LOL ya sports mockery Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackSox13 Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 (edited) QUOTE (kwill @ Dec 7, 2016 -> 05:57 PM) Have to figure Tucker and Reed are involved. This will have to be a depth package. Why depth? The Sox have depth in the low to mid minors but not much to speak of that is somewhat close to MLB ready. Edited December 8, 2016 by BlackSox13 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baron Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 QUOTE (Quinarvy @ Dec 7, 2016 -> 05:59 PM) But best match I see is Cubs write for Sports Mockery I dont like Sports Mockery personally...probably because they've used my tweets before Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigsoxhurt35 Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 QUOTE (flavum @ Dec 7, 2016 -> 06:59 PM) Give me Heyman and Rosenthal or give me death. Or Merkin...who broke the Nats trade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justBLAZE Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 Sean Sears: WhiteSox does not want Springer, it will have to include either Astros Martes, Tucker, or Cameron or potentially a combination of 3. Take it FWIW from Sports Mockery dude. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soxnfins Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 QUOTE (Knuckles @ Dec 7, 2016 -> 06:03 PM) Sean Sears: WhiteSox does not want Springer, it will have to include either Astros Martes, Tucker, or Cameron or potentially a combination of 3. Take it FWIW from Sports Mockery dude. Thank you for stating the obvious that we no longer want Springer, Sears. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 If not Bregman, they had better clean off Houston's next five top position player prospects. Really they need Bregman worse than ever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baron Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 QUOTE (Knuckles @ Dec 7, 2016 -> 06:03 PM) Sean Sears: WhiteSox does not want Springer, it will have to include either Astros Martes, Tucker, or Cameron or potentially a combination of 3. Take it FWIW from Sports Mockery dude. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quin Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Dec 7, 2016 -> 06:07 PM) If not Bregman, they had better clean off Houston's next five top position player prospects. Really they need Bregman worse than ever. Agreed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kwill Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 QUOTE (BlackSox13 @ Dec 7, 2016 -> 06:00 PM) Why depth? The Sox have depth in the low to mid minors but not much to speak of that is somewhat close to MLB ready. I just don't think they have the caliber of the top level guys that the Red Sox and Nationals did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigsoxhurt35 Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 I'll do a frappin' backflip if they get Bregman. It's a dream however, because they wouldn't give him up for Sale. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steveno89 Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 QUOTE (kwill @ Dec 7, 2016 -> 06:08 PM) I just don't think they have the caliber of the top level guys that the Red Sox and Nationals did. Quintana has huge trade value on the open market If bregman is off the table I want martes, reed, tucket plus another piece or two Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 QUOTE (SouthSideSale @ Dec 7, 2016 -> 04:13 PM) I'll do a frappin' backflip if they get Bregman. It's a dream however, because they wouldn't give him up for Sale. I prefer the Dodgers / Rangers in a Q trade, cause they tend to have more quality talent vs. Astros. Will be interesting to see what happens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mmmmmbeeer Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 QUOTE (SouthSideSale @ Dec 7, 2016 -> 07:13 PM) I'll do a frappin' backflip if they get Bregman. It's a dream however, because they wouldn't give him up for Sale. On the other hand, seeing Sale stay in the AL may drive them to make a move they wouldn't have earlier this week if they are serious about competing. With the two trades Hahn has pulled off, he's set the market and I think Houston has to understand it's going to cost bigly to get such talent on a super-friendly contract. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
illinilaw08 Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 QUOTE (Chisoxfn @ Dec 7, 2016 -> 06:15 PM) I prefer the Dodgers / Rangers in a Q trade, cause they tend to have more quality talent vs. Astros. Will be interesting to see what happens. Still hoping the Rockies get involved... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panerista Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Dec 7, 2016 -> 06:07 PM) If not Bregman, they had better clean off Houston's next five top position player prospects. Really they need Bregman worse than ever. or else what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 QUOTE (Deadpool @ Dec 7, 2016 -> 06:17 PM) or else what? Or else they really have doomed themselves to another decade of failure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panerista Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Dec 7, 2016 -> 06:19 PM) Or else they really have doomed themselves to another decade of failure. No team has gone into a decade of failure due to not getting one player. Not in baseball. There will be hundreds of opportunities for improvement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GGajewski18 Posted December 8, 2016 Author Share Posted December 8, 2016 QUOTE (illinilaw08 @ Dec 7, 2016 -> 06:16 PM) Still hoping the Rockies get involved... Jeff Passan @JeffPassan 38s38 seconds ago Sources: The Rockies remain in on Mark Trumbo, as @Ken_Rosenthal said. They'd like to get a front-of-rotation-type pitcher, too, thru trade. Dahl and Rodgers...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackout Friday Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 (edited) I want to see Q to the Yankees for Frazier, Mateo, Rutherford, Torrens (not to be confused with Torres). Edited December 8, 2016 by Blackout Friday Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dam8610 Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Dec 7, 2016 -> 06:19 PM) Or else they really have doomed themselves to another decade of failure. So what if they trade Q for a package similar to the Sale package (maybe a couple more hitters since no one else has a Moncada) that has pitching as part of the value in the deal as well, then they draft well the next 2 years, then, just as this crop of players is coming up, they sign Harper and Machado? Still screwed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 They aren't trading Bregman. Setting yourself up to be disappointed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quin Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 QUOTE (Blackout Friday @ Dec 7, 2016 -> 06:25 PM) I want to see Q to the Yankees for Frazier, Torrens, Rutherford, Torrens (not to be confused with Torres). Wait, what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts