Jump to content

2023 MLB offseason signings and rumors thread


southsider2k5

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, Chick Mercedes said:

Jazz would be pretty damn nice though. Unles you're giving up Montogomery, find a way to make that deal

…solid pre arb player with 4 years of control? I have no idea why they’d do that without getting a top 100 prospect+ back. It absolutely starts with Montgomery and then adds more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So pollock either vastly overrated his value on the open market or really hated playing for Chicago. Which is it??? Cost himself $7 million (I think) by declining his option which was for $14 million I believe. 
 

Personally, at 35 years old with rapidly declining athleticism and ability, I could handle a dysfunctional workplace for an extra $7 mil. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, bighurt4life said:

So pollock either vastly overrated his value on the open market or really hated playing for Chicago. Which is it??? Cost himself $7 million (I think) by declining his option which was for $14 million I believe. 
 

Personally, at 35 years old with rapidly declining athleticism and ability, I could handle a dysfunctional workplace for an extra $7 mil. 

The Sox had to pay him $5 million regardless. I think he only ended up losing a million by choosing to leave which isn’t that much given how much he has made in his career.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, bighurt4life said:

So pollock either vastly overrated his value on the open market or really hated playing for Chicago. Which is it??? Cost himself $7 million (I think) by declining his option which was for $14 million I believe. 
 

Personally, at 35 years old with rapidly declining athleticism and ability, I could handle a dysfunctional workplace for an extra $7 mil. 

$13M player option with $5M buyout. He lost $1M in potential earnings. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, bighurt4life said:

So pollock either vastly overrated his value on the open market or really hated playing for Chicago

? the latter, a rich guy traded $1M to play for a team with a positive vibe and a shot at winning vs. this dumpster fire of an organization. Easy trade....

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • TLR 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, shago said:

? the latter, a rich guy traded $1M to play for a team with a positive vibe and a shot at winning vs. this dumpster fire of an organization. Easy trade....

 Bob Nightengale of USA Today reports that Pollock’s deal also includes $3MM in performance bonuses.

Usually some of those bonuses are pretty much automatic if healthy so instead of being unhappy with the Sox for $13mm, he has chance to be happy and get to $15mm with a base of $12mm

  • Like 1
  • Fire 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, gogosox1959 said:

 Bob Nightengale of USA Today reports that Pollock’s deal also includes $3MM in performance bonuses.

Usually some of those bonuses are pretty much automatic if healthy so instead of being unhappy with the Sox for $13mm, he has chance to be happy and get to $15mm with a base of $12mm

I'd be unhappy if he was still here and they wouldn't have signed Benintendi if they had to pay Pollock.  He sucked here.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, YouCanPutItOnTheBoardYES! said:

The Sox had to pay him $5 million regardless. I think he only ended up losing a million by choosing to leave which isn’t that much given how much he has made in his career.

Yeah - 2M I think difference which is pretty small given his lifetime income and the ability to basically choose his destination. Not sure where he is from but Seattle is west coast and obviously a solid club. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, southsider2k5 said:

 

Makes sense. A team that could potentially be interested in signing him could just trade basically nothing (cash considerations?) for him (Dodgers pay all of salary minus league minimum). Have no idea what team could be interested though. Maybe Rays?

Edited by Bob Sacamano
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Bob Sacamano said:

Makes sense. A team that could potentially be interested in signing him could just trade basically nothing (cash considerations?) for him (Dodgers pay all of salary minus league minimum). Have no idea what team could be interested though. Maybe Rays?

I am going to guess absolutely no one touches him with his exsiting contract, even if LAD was wiling to pay it.  It is worth it for LA to try, but I doubt it happens.  Seeing the article where LA met with him and he expressed no remorse or anything to try to soften a potential return, I doubt anyone else in MLB finds him palatable either.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, southsider2k5 said:

I am going to guess absolutely no one touches him with his exsiting contract, even if LAD was wiling to pay it.  It is worth it for LA to try, but I doubt it happens.  Seeing the article where LA met with him and he expressed no remorse or anything to try to soften a potential return, I doubt anyone else in MLB finds him palatable either.

Yeah I don't think so either but I get the idea of seeing if anyone wants him at basically league minimum, which teams can do when he's a free agent but with no potential competition anyway. Dude may be pitching in Mexico.

Edit: I have thought that maybe teams that already do not draw well would maybe take a chance since backlash would be minimal.

Edited by Bob Sacamano
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, southsider2k5 said:

I am going to guess absolutely no one touches him with his exsiting contract, even if LAD was wiling to pay it.  It is worth it for LA to try, but I doubt it happens.  Seeing the article where LA met with him and he expressed no remorse or anything to try to soften a potential return, I doubt anyone else in MLB finds him palatable either.

I can envision an org two who’s fan base might not be out of the realm of being able to accept him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...