Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Soxtalk.com

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Manaea to Padres, Sox were in on him

Featured Replies

  • Replies 208
  • Views 15.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • TaylorStSox
    TaylorStSox

    The board is like a contest between Caufield and Jack to see who can be the biggest shit poster. 

  • TheFutureIsNear
    TheFutureIsNear

    This board has become full on insufferable. The White Sox not having a window beyond 2023 is 1 of the dumber things typed on the internet today

  • michelangelosmonkey
    michelangelosmonkey

    Mike Schmidt came up at same age as Vaughn, same number of at bats, lower first season OPS and he couldn't hit righties at all.   The Phillies were not stupid enough to trade him for some 30 year old

Posted Images

4 minutes ago, SoxBlanco said:

I think the plan is to just wait until the deadline now. See what the team looks like in July and see what other players (pitchers) might be available. Some of our younger prospects might have increased their value a little bit, too. 

Isn't that risky? Hahn would appear to be desperate, if the team were already dealing with a hobbled, thin starting staff. Claiming to merely be trying to add depth is better than desperately trying to find a trading partner, because you don't have anyone who is available to provide quality innings. So far, all of the starters are still healthy, with the exception of Lynn, about whose status we don't yet know. 

4 minutes ago, Heads22 said:

 

So what can we trade Burger to SD for?

3 minutes ago, Lillian said:

Isn't that risky? Hahn would appear to be desperate, if the team were already dealing with a hobbled, thin starting staff. Claiming to merely be trying to add depth is better than desperately trying to find a trading partner, because you don't have anyone who is available to provide quality innings. So far, all of the starters are still healthy, with the exception of Lynn, about whose status we don't yet know. 

Of course it is. But it's also possible the hold a decent division lead early and can "wait" to acquire a starter. But it's all a risk. 

Or you don't have to worry about any of this and just use money to sign whoever you want...but that ship has unfortunately sailed. 

5 minutes ago, Heads22 said:

 

Sox are at least trying, but getting burned by having a crap farm system. 

5 minutes ago, Heads22 said:

 

The farm system is going to kill us from being able to acquire a significant piece I feel

2 hours ago, TheFutureIsNear said:

This board has become full on insufferable. The White Sox not having a window beyond 2023 is 1 of the dumber things typed on the internet today

The board is like a contest between Caufield and Jack to see who can be the biggest shit poster. 

13 minutes ago, Chicago White Sox said:

That may be the plan, but it’s a huge risk to go with what got now.  I really hope Hahn has an ace up his sleeve here.

Hard to think he has an ace up his sleeve when the Sox are pretty close to the CBT since the Kimbrel contract was a wash with the Pollock contract. They are out of Aces in the deck they are playing.

Just now, CaliSoxFanViaSWside said:

Hard to think he has an ace up his sleeve when the Sox are pretty close to the CBT since the Kimbrel contract was a wash with the Pollock contract. They are out of Aces in the deck they are playing.

Maybe they shouldn’t have wasted $8 million on Josh Harrison and Vince Velasquez.

1 minute ago, YouCanPutItOnTheBoardYES! said:

Maybe they shouldn’t have wasted $8 million on Josh Harrison and Vince Velasquez.

I'd rather have Alex Cobb for $10 million this year than those 2. 

Just now, CaliSoxFanViaSWside said:

Hard to think he has an ace up his sleeve when the Sox are pretty close to the CBT since the Kimbrel contract was a wash with the Pollock contract. They are out of Aces in the deck they are playing.

I think we have close to $20M in CBT space, I think the bigger concern is cash payroll, but we did open up some with the Kimbrel trade.

Just now, Chicago White Sox said:

I think we have close to $20M in CBT space, I think the bigger concern is cash payroll, but we did open up some with the Kimbrel trade.

Didn't it come to just about $1M gained in the Kimbrel deal ? Or if you are talking about payroll cash then more since the buyout may not count against payroll ?

4 minutes ago, CaliSoxFanViaSWside said:

Didn't it come to just about $1M gained in the Kimbrel deal ? Or if you are talking about payroll cash then more since the buyout may not count against payroll ?

I think CBT wise it was kimbrel for 16 but Pollock for 7.5. Pollock has 10 this year and a 5 buyout next year so his is spread out over 2.

Just now, ptatc said:

I think CBT wise it was kimbrel for 16 but Pollock for 7.5. Pollock has 10 this year and a 5 buyout next year so his is spread out over 2.

Wasn't there a $3M signing bonus too ? I mean I read the whole conversations on it but I never got a clear understanding of what goes under the CBT and what goes under payroll.

8 minutes ago, ptatc said:

I think CBT wise it was kimbrel for 16 but Pollock for 7.5. Pollock has 10 this year and a 5 buyout next year so his is spread out over 2.

Nah. Pollock CBT number is $12m. 

Edited by ChiSox59

Just now, ChiSox59 said:

Nah. Pollack CBT number is $12m. 

So they gained 4?

8 minutes ago, CaliSoxFanViaSWside said:

Didn't it come to just about $1M gained in the Kimbrel deal ? Or if you are talking about payroll cash then more since the buyout may not count against payroll ?

Guaranteed money is only $1M different, but the CBT and cash impact is quite bit less for this year.

44 minutes ago, Look at Ray Ray Run said:

Why would the sox trade Vaughn for mitch Keller?

If the Sox were gonna target a pirates pitcher, a cheap shrewd move would be inquiring about JT Brubaker.

Because they need a controllable SP more than a controllable 1B/DH. 

10 minutes ago, Chicago White Sox said:

Guaranteed money is only $1M different, but the CBT and cash impact is quite bit less for this year.

Contract Notes for Pollock from Spotrac

Contract Notes:
  • 2022 opt out available ($5M buyout), with 1,000 plate appearances across 2020-2021, or 1,450 plate appearances across 2019-2021 (not earned)
  • 2023 Player Option includes a $5M buyout
  • 2023 Option escalates $1M each for 
    400,450,500,550,600 Plate Appearances in 2022
  • 2023 option increases $1M per point based on finish in 2019-22 MVP voting, with 5 points for first place, 3 points for second-fifth place, and 1 point for sixth-10th place

Edited by CaliSoxFanViaSWside

8 minutes ago, ptatc said:

So they gained 4?

Yep

9 minutes ago, ptatc said:

So they gained 4?

$4M in Luxury tax and $3M in Payroll Salary according to Spotrac .

35 minutes ago, HahnsKiddieTable said:

The farm system is going to kill us from being able to acquire a significant piece I feel

That might change quite a bit by July. 

Hopefully the Sox keep loading up on high schoolers in the upcoming draft and sign younger talent during IFA. 

Edited by Rey21

45 minutes ago, YouCanPutItOnTheBoardYES! said:

Maybe they shouldn’t have wasted $8 million on Josh Harrison and Vince Velasquez.

Hindsight is undefeated. 

Obviously by the Pollack move and being close on Manaea here at the end, the Sox had a plan in place.  

 

49 minutes ago, YouCanPutItOnTheBoardYES! said:

Maybe they shouldn’t have wasted $8 million on Josh Harrison and Vince Velasquez.

Yep, the Manaea pursuit may have ended when they essentially only saved a million dollars on the Kimbrel trade.

Reasonable chance the 10 million coming back was too much regardless of the asking price.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.