Lip Man 1 Posted 11 hours ago Share Posted 11 hours ago 49 minutes ago, 77 Hitmen said: Thank you! The Bears have spent most of the last 3 decades fielding very mediocre and frequently getting embarrassed by their arch rivals. This is only their 7th playoff appearance in 30 years. ...and yet, fans in Chicago are as rabid about the Bears as ever (even before this year's resurgence). Let's get real. While they'd much prefer ending up in Arlington Heights, having a stadium in Gary/Hammond isn't going to slow their popularity. Agreed and the other benefit is that Illinois taxpayers won't be on the hook. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Beast Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago I don’t really understand what the f*** the Bears want. Like, is the team needing tax breaks because George McCaskey is too fucking poor to pay for a stadium? And Kevin Warren is too ineffective at his job that he needs tax incentives from Indiana to get a new stadium built? The reporting suggests they need infrastructure around Arlington Heights. Pritzker discussed that with them and presumably offered it to them. They have to negotiate with the local tax body for the property taxes. What else does George and his old ass board need to get a stadium in Illinois? If the Bears move to Indiana and the White Sox move to Nashville, I may follow a message board and maybe coverage but something will be different. I’d want a new franchise to move in, like a MLB expansion team or the Chicago Jaguars, to fill a void. It sounds ridiculous, but something would be different for the fan base and it will turn some segment of the fan base off. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lip Man 1 Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago 2 hours ago, The Beast said: I don’t really understand what the f*** the Bears want. Like, is the team needing tax breaks because George McCaskey is too fucking poor to pay for a stadium? And Kevin Warren is too ineffective at his job that he needs tax incentives from Indiana to get a new stadium built? The reporting suggests they need infrastructure around Arlington Heights. Pritzker discussed that with them and presumably offered it to them. They have to negotiate with the local tax body for the property taxes. What else does George and his old ass board need to get a stadium in Illinois? If the Bears move to Indiana and the White Sox move to Nashville, I may follow a message board and maybe coverage but something will be different. I’d want a new franchise to move in, like a MLB expansion team or the Chicago Jaguars, to fill a void. It sounds ridiculous, but something would be different for the fan base and it will turn some segment of the fan base off. The White Sox aren't moving to Nashville. You can rest easy in that regard based by statements by Ishbia himself to the Pope. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greg775 Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago On 1/8/2026 at 1:48 PM, WBWSF said: 1) There have been rumors in KC that if anew Royals stadium doesn't get done they will likely move to Nashville. 2) The Bears front office was suppose to meet with the Indiana officials 2 days ago. (January 6) I wonder if that happened. The Bears stadium issue seems to have become very quiet. Kansas has its Chiefs; they don't need or want the Royals now. Missouri knows it can't lose both franchises so certainly the state will provide some big bucks via taxes to allow KCR to move downtown. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greg775 Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago 2 hours ago, The Beast said: I don’t really understand what the f*** the Bears want. Like, is the team needing tax breaks because George McCaskey is too fucking poor to pay for a stadium? And Kevin Warren is too ineffective at his job that he needs tax incentives from Indiana to get a new stadium built? The reporting suggests they need infrastructure around Arlington Heights. Pritzker discussed that with them and presumably offered it to them. They have to negotiate with the local tax body for the property taxes. What else does George and his old ass board need to get a stadium in Illinois? If the Bears move to Indiana and the White Sox move to Nashville, I may follow a message board and maybe coverage but something will be different. I’d want a new franchise to move in, like a MLB expansion team or the Chicago Jaguars, to fill a void. It sounds ridiculous, but something would be different for the fan base and it will turn some segment of the fan base off. The Indiana talk is absurd. The Bears aren't leaving Illinois. They probably won't even leave Chicago for AH. From an outsider it's obvious Arlington Hts would be nirvana for the Bears. Sweetheart deal to move there and it's obvious they are would be turned into an amazing place full of hotels, restaurants and the like. Surprising they won't move to Arlington. But Indiana? Please. Ain't gonna happen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greg775 Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago 11 hours ago, 77 Hitmen said: Kansas City is one of the smallest markets in MLB. Nashville is about the same size and booming. They can probably support a team just as well as KC. The thing about Nashville, though is that the city/state just spent an insane amount of money for the new Titans stadium, so public funding for a MLB park there is questionable. On the other hand, Portland's metro area is bigger than KC's and the state of Oregon has committed $800M in public money toward an MLB stadium. Is it probable that the Royals will move? No. But I don't think the idea is laughable either - especially when there's $800M in public money sitting there. Portland is probably going to miss out on a western expansion team to Salt Lake City, so they'd be more than happy to get an existing team to move there. In the end, I think they'll get a deal done with Missouri. They were already going to offer spending 50% of the stadium costs for both the Royals AND Chiefs. Now that the Chiefs are leaving, more of that money can be directed toward getting a deal done with the Royals. No matter what, I'll be very surprised if the Royals are still playing at Kauffman Stadium after 2031. I just don't see that happening. The Royals definitely want out of Kauffman. I'm sure the city will accommodate them after the embarrassment of losing the Chiefs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.