Eh, I disagree about the Trout comparisons. The reality is that there is no other good comparison for his potential other than Trout. He has all of the tools that Trout does, the difference is that Trout has done it consistently at the MLB level. The other comparison I'd use is Cano(on the juice) with 35+ SB potential. I fail to find a better comparison to Moncada's ceiling other than Trout because Moncada has incredibly rare physical talent, The kind only the best of the best in baseball history have had. The Trout stuff is if he reaches his ceiling. I have consistently said "a notch below Trout" is Moncada's ceiling mostly because he's never going to hit .340 like Trout has.(I could see Moncada in the .310-320 range for a season or two if he puts it all together) In all other aspects of the game, his potential is right there. If You asked me if there was a player other than Trout that you would bet to be the next 40-40 player I'd pick Moncada. He's that talented. I don't think there is a player in baseball who has that potential other than Trout and Moncada. There is only a handful of players that I could name off the top of my head that have/had the physical gifts that Moncada has. You wouldn't want me to name them, because the comparison would seem so ridiculous, but I will anyway: When it comes to tools, Moncada is up there with the following: Trout, Mantle, Mays, Ken Griffey Jr, Bonds(off the juice) I'm not kidding and it isn't crazy either. What is crazy is saying that we know if he'll reach that level of performance. He may not, but he is that talented.
Moncada is also extremely raw for a 23 year old at the MLB level. I think there is a 5-10% chance that Moncada reaches his ceiling, which is way more than the odds of you winning the powerball. There is also a >40% chance that he's a 4-6 WAR guy each year, given that he's already put up a 2.5 WAR in 160 games with the White Sox. Moncada's ceiling is the best all around 2B to ever play baseball if he sticks there. How well the Sox coaching staff can tap into his talent is what will determine how good he gets. What makes Moncada so polarizing is that he oozes physical talent, the likes that have only been seen before in the best of the best baseball players of all time, but it is so incredibly unrefined for a player at his age and level. I don't think any of this is ridiculous or hyperbole. Moncada, if he reaches his ceiling, absolutely has a chance to be the starter at 2B in the "all time starting 9", and one of the 10 best position players to ever play the game. If it all goes south on him, he has the chance to be quite possibly the biggest bust in MLB history as well. It goes both ways. Because of the country Moncada came from, his variance on career outcomes is much higher than the players I listed earlier. If you don't think I acknowledge that, you haven't been listening. He got decent instruction later than most players. It seems that in Cuba they just let them go play baseball and let the talent take over. There seems to be very little, if any formal instruction on fundamentals.