I think you misunderstand what I meant. I'm talking about JR playing GM and doing things like hiring Tony La Russa. JR has had his fingerprints over baseball operations since he's been around and now he seems to let the GM have free reign. Whether that's due to old age, selling the team or a genuine willingness to try something different, I have no idea, I'm not a mind reader.
I do enjoy how that 'play for second place' quote is received differently nowadays around here evidently. We used to all resonate over how stupid of a thing it was. How JR doesn't desire to win but desires to profiteer.
Yeah, I'm pretty consistent about the bolded point. AK went all in one year, it failed because of poor talent evaluation and it jettisoned the future by perpetually trading first round draft picks for has beens. He continues to double down on this horrible strategy leaving the Bulls in NBA hell. I was excited that first season of going 'all in', but it was an unabashed failure. "At least he tried" isn't good enough. Instead of giving up first rounders (and more) for Vucevic, DeRozan, Lonzo Ball, they should've traded Zach Lavine at the height of his trade value. They might've gotten a king's ransom for him like OKC got for Paul George. I'd criticize the Sox/Getz for not doing the same thing with Luis Robert after 2023. I might criticize the Cease return, but I think teams actually valued him appropriately and the jury is out on any of the players returned in that deal (though it's not looking promising).
I don't 'stan' Getz, I think it's too early to genuinely know if he's good at the job or not, but I very much appreciate that the White Sox operate far differently than the Stone Age Hahn/Kenny teams. Operate in a similar way that most winning franchises do in this day in age. I've provided a few 'bottomfeeder to good' teams as examples of this process. Are the White Sox those teams? It's too early to say, but the framework and ideation is similar. Good organizational hires who have seemed to make an impact. As stated, I'd change my tune if we're not winning by 2027 and signing real players next offseason. That seems like an aggressive timeframe for a baseball rebuild if anything.
I think it's a reasonable perspective for fans to want to watch a 'competitive' team that plays .500ish baseball. It's fun to go to a game or turn on the TV and maybe see a win. The Bulls capture these sorts of fans, the JR quote I cited is rooted in that feeling. But for some reason, I think forum posters and 'diehards' do not necessarily share that perspective. We're entertained regardless or we would've be talking all this s%*# on the internet lol. Good or bad, there's always something to discuss. We haven't tuned out of the Sox. I'm actually tuning back into the Bulls next season, they have a couple of young players whose development I'd like to watch and they played a lot better after finally getting rid of Zach.
There seems to be some philosophical differences between rebuilding and treadmilling. If I the GM, I'd follow a similar 'tanking' path where it seems to me you'd do what the Royals did to produce the team they have currently. They've had OK teams the last two years, right? But they're pretty much tapped out and are missing the postseason this year. The Twins followed a similar route and I think they might break the Sox record next season. Teams that aren't the Yankees and Dodgers don't go from treadmill to great. You simply have to build it internally.