Leaderboard

I can’t believe any mentally stable human was capable of voting him for POTUS. I don’t care what your political party is. I don’t care how bad of a candidate Hilary was (and yes she sucked). Trump is a selfish unethical incompetent douche bully manipulator. Him being POTUS is an abomination to the free world and we’re finally paying the price for it now.

He is an absolute travesty

Don't worry guys, the experts are on the case. Everything will be back up and running in no time.

Illinois has now seen new cases drop 2 days in a row.

I feel so much better now. The light is at the end of the tunnel.

I bought 50 N95 masks back in mid February (was hard to find them even then) planning to either use them or sell them (I paid $150 for the box). After seeing all the PPE news I contacted an ex GF and she helped me donate them (she's a nurse), so I feel good about that. I could have sold the box for $3000 or more. People are paying $50 a N95 mask on clist. Oh well, wasn't the right thing to do.

This is a great day for Bulls fans. Hopefully they hired the right guy. At least we know they fired the right guy. His opinion about Gar seems pretty, pretty, pretty spot on, so good start.

Traditionalist but this would be so much fun for 1 season.

I can see WS dangling a well below slot-value offer to him and keeping powder dry for rounds 2-5.

From a former soxtalker

I joined 90 minutes in at 630 a.m. China time. Two points, the China travel ban was just 20% of travelers, ONLY tourist visas. 80% of Chinese passengers still got through. Secondly, even if the national stockpiles were completely barren (they weren’t) at the end of the Obama administration, the swine flu and ebola issues depleted part of it and it’s not exactly like the Tea Party Congresses were pinpointing that as a spending priority, in fact, quite the opposite. There were three plus years to fix it, but surely he never knew they existed before six weeks ago. Finally, the CDC is clearly the one who messed up the testing. How could there be an existing test sitting around ready for a virus no scientist had ever encountered before? Yes, six eastern states (NY, NJ, CT, RI, MA, PA) and then Washington, Oregon and California.

And his supporters will tell you why it's the perfect group . . .

Nothing is funnier today than Boylen sending a press release to congratulate the Reinsdorfs on hiring AK ?

That's not something I'm too terribly worried about with this guy. He's big, strong, athletic and he does it really clean and easy. They can make little adjustments to help him add some deception or they could give him a 2 seamer or a different grip to make the ball cut. He checks a lot of boxes for me.

The bulls are graduating from being a mom and pop shop to an organization. There are a lot of advantages there, and I do think their limited bandwidth hurt them in trade market. Now let's hope it's a well run organization, but I'm feeling very positive. It is as close to a clean house as you can get considering the multiple asst. gms coming in.

Kjerstad at 11 please

For the first time in years, I am actually interested in following the Bulls again.

Pax staying on as a senior adviser (but again...follows narrative that Pax would do as much / little as he wanted).

It has been an unreal week for a bulls fan.

If Jordan and Bird got into this HORSE tourney I would probably buy it on pay per view.

The fun part is, this is probably going to time out so the second wave hits right about election day. Dibs on Trump calling off the elections.

Apparently the site allows one name change per year. Should make Pants Rowland happy. He seemed a tad salty when PantsRowland suddenly appeared. ☺

It makes me happy to seriously discuss baseball division implications.

Welcome back. Hell of a memory you have. I hope you can say the same thing about logging on to ST 50 years from now Also as owner of Soxtalk, just want to tell the rest of you, welcome aboard. Make this place your home and feel free to venture to the other parts of the board too. Go Sox and stay safe during these unique times!

That middle paragraph is unlikely to happen if Trump retains office...in fact, quite the opposite. As long as the primary system appeals to or attracts only the most committed party members on both sides, you’re going to see extremism prevail. Look at AOC knocking out Crowley with something like 7,000 votes. The middle has to become more active, and they need to change their messaging to a more hopeful/aspirational tone in order to motivate people to get involved. No more of the same establishment, status quo, neo-liberal bromides. You can be pragmatic and realistic while developing new ideas. Look at Yang’s campaign, for example. Even if Biden wins, there’s going to be a huge battle over the future direction of the WHO...either you reform it, or start an altogether different entity. Even then, let’s say you exclude Russia, Iran and China but somehow manage to get India, Mexico, Brazil, Europe, Australia, Japan and South Korea mostly on board...what does that actually accomplish? What about the Middle East and Africa? We talk about political polarization in the US, but Europe is going to have to make a choice at some point between an American and Chinese-led version of the future in terms of technology, the use of surveillance, press and internet freedoms, shared scientific research and a whole range of things that are unresolved. Who currently possesses the credibility to get that done and bring the entire world together in one common cause? Europe is weakened...the Chinese economy is in shambles and America has to sort its own problems out first.

Jim - You might be right, but I think there are probably other industries / sectors that have been more severely battered who might be better long-term ploys. When you look at how devalued Oil is, LT, we still have major needs there and as long as you are staying away from those with heavy exposure to Shale, you will do good (I think). Just don't bet on one individual company, go more broad / be diversified. There are some strong financial giants who have been severely hit and are trading well below 08/09 crisis type returns (and they are extremely well capitalized to weather the storm, pay solid dividends, and generate good returns as the economy normalizes). And than on the infrastructure front, I think long term there are going to be some good investments in that sector. I would never worry about finding the bottom in times like this, rather try and do some dollar cost averaging while macro prices are low (as long as you can hold for the long). The volatility is not done and while I'm never certain, I would suspect we have more bad days to come. The economy is going to shrink 25% in the 2nd quarter and I think we are going to see pockets of reinfection during the course of 2020 (I hope not...but I suspect we will) and I don't know that current markets reflect those things. Pick and choose those sectors you like LT but low cost index funds aren't bad either (I always think betting on the LT economy of the US is the best bet you can make...because if we are wrong...well we got way bigger fish to fry). All that said, even if you buy today (and I think prices are probably headed more down near term than up...but I would have said that a week ago and have been dead wrong cause I didn't see this big of a dead cat bounce coming)...you are still getting a LT value when everything bounces up. I never worry of did I buy @ 30% down vs. 20% down. I'm just happy I got some of that down...because if you time a few of those in the general vicinity (and for me it is always about going in...more than timing the out because I always think you have more risk when you try and time the out...because at that point...you miss out on the LT of what the equities are going to do for your accumulation). An investor that sits on cash is inherently going to lose over the long-run (too many times will you false time a "bottom" and miss on extended gains which are necessary for the time you never see the bottom and take a pretty immediate 20-30% beating (and those just flat out will happen). All of this of course has to align with each individuals appetite for volatility and near term needs for the funds they are investing. The more near term needs you have, the much more different and risk averse your portfolio needs to be (but you also need to really challenge what those "near-term" needs are...because if you can better protect your near term than you can be more aggressive during scarier times and in the long-run, your retirement will thank you (This last bit is probably less advice for you Jim since you are much closer to retirement but where you have pensions / other guarantees those are things you have to contemplate when you evaluate your overall exposure to risk/equities...i.e., if you already can get 60-70% of your income covered through fixed streams, you may want to be more aggressive with your equity assets knowing you could bunker down and cut your spend/liquidity for 2-3 years (if things really good rough) for the long term good of your retirement portfolio. Also...I will have a counter to Mike's point on target date funds. If you aren't going to regularly check your 401k's, etc, a target date fund is absolutely better than what the general public will individual pick and manage to. Target dates outperform individuals 401k's by a large margin, so for some people, a target date fund is the absolute right investment choice (given their risk tolerances, knowledge of the markets, and appetite for trading on a more regular basis). Just look at the few of those funds. Vanguard has some really good, cost effective target date funds that are naturally going to manage your risks and shift exposures over time. And for those that think you should only be equities....a big reminder there is if you are inherently in equities vs. more mixed, you have very little downside buffer when the market bombs. Meaning...everything you had dropped...which is fine and it will return, but if you had some fixed income in there, you could actually leverage the safety and the lower drop you had and more strategically shift your portfolio into equities following that drop, generate higher returns on the bounce back, and than rebalance your portfolio. I.e., having some fixed income hedges some of your downside, while minimally chewing into your LT returns (if you do nothing), and, depending on your appetite, can help you be a buyer of discounted risk when times are tight. PS: None of the above constitutes as any financial advice. Everyone needs to analyze what is individually best for them, based upon their own financial perspective, short-term and long-term goals, and of course their risk appetites, etc.

When I was in college for broadcasting I got to sit in the booth with DJ/Ed for a broadcast in 2014. Ed was so cool to me. He took aside a lot of time to give me tips and let me ask him some questions. He said "Hey, I have five minutes. Here's your chance! I will answer ANY question." I was stunned and didn't know what to say. I didn't even expect an acknowledgement outside of maybe a "hey, how do ya do". The media guy who showed me in there told me to sit and be silent. I did not wind-up having to do that, in the least. lol I was sad to hear of his passing.