Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 02/05/2020 in all areas

  1. Such a weird debate some of you are backing. The Angels got Joc for nothing bc the current price, due to the Dodgers' needs post Mookie trade, was much less than it was before they landed Betts. Had we traded for Joc prior to LA landing Betts we would have had to pay much more (Bummer was the reported ask). So the only argument would be to have gone into February with the same RF situation as last year while we hoped LA traded for Betts and made Joc's asking price less. IMO Mazara is the perfect fit for our 2020 needs. He is only 24 and has upside. He makes us better in RF compared to 19. We can cut him if he sucks. We can still go after Joc next year if we want.
    6 points
  2. What a massive overreaction.
    6 points
  3. Or we could just stop engaging with you and move along to more important things in life.
    5 points
  4. I guess I'm glad the Sox didn't wait Until the eve of Spring Training in hopes that the Betts trade was done with the dodgers in order to make Joc available and cheaper than normal. because it would be the Sox luck that Joc was traded to the Angels regardless
    4 points
  5. There was nothing stopping the White Sox from trading for Pederson yesterday.
    4 points
  6. His Achilles injuries not ankle injuries had nothing to do with his weight. Most of the people who tear them are the fit athletic people who ignore the tendonopathy which precedes the tear. Judging by some comments being made the second one was probably due to lack of dedication to rehab.
    3 points
  7. 3 points
  8. It isn’t black and white. One side is proclaiming a grievance based on previously unavailable hindsight. We have what we have and that’s it. Move on.
    3 points
  9. You guys realize that if the Sox had waited this long to fill RF the Dodgers would have thus had multiple suitors and held out for more, right?
    3 points
  10. I predict, I am gonna say it like I mean it..... I predict, Jake Burger is done with baseball.
    3 points
  11. I am also with Jack here. A certain buy low guy. If nothing happens, who it's fine. He will still be one of the best #8 hitters if nothing else. But he also has a chance (albeit small) to explode. Joc is who Joc is. Joc > Mazara obviously.. But Mazara's ceiling > Joc.
    3 points
  12. I am not one to defend this FO and had been advocating these clowns to be fired for too long now. It is lost cause with JR and his son in charge so I don’t even bother these days. What I don’t get is your infatuation with Sexton and constant attempt to belittle WCJ who is a fine young player. I get that in the new age NBA you need ball handlers, and shooters to build a dynamic offense. While Sexton fits the bill, he is also terribly limited in other areas and struggles defensively not being able to defend bigger guys. It’s no coincidence he’s one of the worst defensive guards in the league for the second year in a row, while on the other hand WCJ is a top 20 defensive big across several metrics. As others have pointed out, you do notice the difference defensively after WCJ went down with injury. And this isn’t Trae Young we’re talking about, while being a smaller guard could change the game in a number of ways with elite skill sets You’re a stats guy, so I trust that you have looked past his scoring numbers and looked at advanced stats - WS VORP, PER, on/off court differentials, RPM, etc. I don’t see Sexton even being close to making the impact WCJ does. I am not into getting into a debate that Wendell’s growth has been stunted by playing for a coach who has no business coaching in the NBA and who has shown no success whatsoever drawing up a game plan for his big men on offense.
    3 points
  13. There are so many fake obstacles in here it’s ridiculous. Oh they’d have to beat the angels offer in a short amount of time?!?!?! They’d have to trade a player teams know they don’t need? Why that hasn’t happened since...the last time Mazara was traded. It can’t be done dammit! I’ll give shorthand to the last 13 pages: any move the Sox make is not only the best move, but the only move that could ever have been possible forever and ever amen.
    2 points
  14. Here's a good example of a player who injected after age 26/27.
    2 points
  15. Ideally? An employee of a major billion dollar company speaking in a role as a representative of that company on a public network.
    2 points
  16. lol, some people think you can turn chicken shit into chicken salad. they can safely be ignored.
    2 points
  17. Everybody would prefer a better player in RF. That's...not even an argument. But Steele Walker is not a lamentable loss.
    2 points
  18. I don't really understand all the outrage over not getting Pederson. Yeah he's better than Mazara, but he's only a 1 year rental. And it's not like Hahn could have foreseen that Pederson would be traded for next to nothing in February. I'm not Hahn's biggest fan by any means but I don't see this as something worth being that upset about.
    2 points
  19. God I'm so glad the Sox didn't think Ozuna or Castellanos were actually good options.
    2 points
  20. Don't need to try again. You continue to rehash the same thing but don't address any points people are making. This post in question had nothing to do with what happened at the time of the mazara trade. It had everything to do with what would have happened if the trade hadn't occurred.
    2 points
  21. 2 points
  22. 1. Ozuna was a bad fit. 2. That Castellanos contract is horrendoes 3. we couldn't wait months and months in the hopes the Dodgers would trade Betts and make Joc expendable.. Clearly Joc wasn't avaialble at this cost prior..
    2 points
  23. Again, you missing the point of posts. He isn't saying that there weren't better options. He was saying that if the Sox waited until today to acquire a player would would have been complaining the whole time that they don't have one yet. In your post, Castellanos and Ozuna aren't available today so they don't count.
    2 points
  24. False. Better options than Mazara were acquired after the move was made — Ozuna, Castellanos, and now Joc.
    2 points
  25. Again, the price for Joc was not the same 2 months ago as it was yesterday. The price for Joc + Strip went down because the Dodgers had to shed salary to stay under the cap after acquiring Mookie - belief around the game is the only directive Friedman was given this off-season was to get under the threshold and reset the tax. This opens up the ability to re-sign Mookie next off-season and not pay through the roof in tax. This forced the Dodgers to trade Joc + for less than they wanted because they had to dump the salary to get under the threshold.
    2 points
  26. Close this thread. It's one of the dumbest arguments ever. Kenny Williams and Rick Hahn won a championship. John Paxson's reign of terror is going on year #18 with 5 playoff series wins and 7 head coaches. It's not even close to the same.
    2 points
  27. Better option at what price that is the key factors. Pederson was not an option at the time. He was recently but it's not worth the extra capital. As the original poster said, pederson has flaws as well and you are over valuing him based on what the Sox acquired which has nothing to do with his value to the Angels.
    2 points
  28. He was a below replacement level player in 148 game in 2017 and has never even had a 1 WAR season. He has one skill, hitting RHP, and if he doesn't thrive at that then he's not even worth playing. His floor is higher than Charlie Tilson, Ryan Cordell, and Daniel Palka though, I'll give him that.
    2 points
  29. Thanks for being rational. Mazara has a huge ceiling still. Only 24.
    2 points
  30. I never said you can't . I just pointed out that you don't use it in the context of the question and/or post that you are responding to. We all know your view on it and you certainly can say whatever you want. However, you continually twist whatever post to which you are responding back to the same topic instead of the post to which you are responding. It doesn't matter if someone calls me out or nails me on anything. The point still remains about replying to the content of the actual posts.
    1 point
  31. what good is "control" of a C+, likely AAAA OF? Not much. And you're acting like Mazara is only a 2020 player. He could be a short or medium or even long term RF option.
    1 point
  32. And those deals have nothing to do with the current team, Sorry if I trust my own judgment and how the Sox and the other teams valued Castellanos and Ozuna over yours. We'll see how things play out. It actually has worked out pretty well for the Sox with all those guys available next year. I'm more concerned about the team beyond 2020 than you are .
    1 point
  33. Yeah, which is a real problem within the game. There is no penalty for spending nothing and profiting endless, but there is a penalty for spending at the top of the bracket. It's very anti-player, and I'm shocked they didn't see this problem beforehand.
    1 point
  34. The deal for Maeda feels weird by the Twins. I wasn't as high on Gatreol as some, but Maeda isn't exactly a work horse (probably has a similar innings cap) and while he's been effective, its been in a very unique way due to creative usage by the Dodgers. He's a nice piece, but it seems like the Twins gave up a lot and actually may have hurt their roster 2-3 years from now for a, hopefully, short term upgrade. The Twins obviously didn't like him as much as the market.
    1 point
  35. Agreed with everything here. Not a bad spot to be in to have another team's number 4 hitter in our 8 spot.
    1 point
  36. If you would stick to the point if the post of Pederson's value, yes. However twisting into the Sox FO again gets a little tiresome. But it's a Sox board so have at it.
    1 point
  37. I mean, they have. Together. And Garpax never has. Williams and hahn weren't President and GM but they were GM and asst GM. But they have experienced winning as a result of their jobs. Garpax never has
    1 point
  38. Passan is reporting that there's more to the deal.
    1 point
  39. Yes. I heard that Bummer was the asking price this year.
    1 point
  40. Ok but the argument is literally from the Sox perspective as to why they didn't. Not yours.
    1 point
  41. He did predict the betts/price to LA for Verdugo+ earlier today
    1 point
  42. You already beat the horse months ago.
    1 point
  43. Who cares? Trade crap for the better outfielder (Joc) and trade Mazara for a reliever. What are you missing?
    1 point
  44. He's been trashing WCJ since he was a rookie last year and was the second best (some might argue the best although I won't go that far) Bulls player (by far the best defender). It's a bit odd.
    1 point
  45. No. But he is a friend of mine. He didn't kick him, he punched him. AJ took a bounced pitched to the balls. When the trainer came to him to ask him how he feels, AJ punched him and said "like this, what do you think."
    1 point
  46. They called Miami "Florida" and spelled Cincinnati wrong...so I think that is your answer.
    1 point
This leaderboard is set to Chicago/GMT-05:00
×
×
  • Create New...