Y2Jimmy0 Posted November 28, 2017 Share Posted November 28, 2017 White Sox have to tender contracts to or non-tender the following players: Jose Abreu Leury Garcia Avisail Garcia Al Albuquerque Danny Farquhar Jake Petricka Zach Putnam Carlos Rodon Yolmer Sanchez What do you guys think? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eminor3rd Posted November 28, 2017 Share Posted November 28, 2017 I think any or all of those relievers could go, but I think they'd try to bring all of them back on Minor league deals. If it was up to me, I'd just tender all of them knowing my payroll is like five million total already. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted November 28, 2017 Share Posted November 28, 2017 QUOTE (Y2JImmy0 @ Nov 28, 2017 -> 12:39 PM) White Sox have to tender contracts to or non-tender the following players: Jose Abreu Leury Garcia Avisail Garcia Al Albuquerque Danny Farquhar Jake Petricka Zach Putnam Carlos Rodon Yolmer Sanchez What do you guys think? Non-tender on Putnam at least. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted November 28, 2017 Share Posted November 28, 2017 I think Putnam, Farquhar, and Albuquerque get non tendered. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted November 28, 2017 Share Posted November 28, 2017 Is there some sort of rule where they have to wait til this week to non-tender players? I would think if they non-tendered anyone, it would have happened to make room to protect prospects on the 40. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flavum Posted November 28, 2017 Share Posted November 28, 2017 https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2017/11/2017...candidates.html The relievers are all possibilities, I guess. Still wondering why they didn’t have room for one more protected prospect. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flavum Posted November 28, 2017 Share Posted November 28, 2017 (edited) QUOTE (soxfan2014 @ Nov 28, 2017 -> 12:44 PM) Is there some sort of rule where they have to wait til this week to non-tender players? I would think if they non-tendered anyone, it would have happened to make room to protect prospects on the 40. They don’t announce non-tenders until that date. Remember last year when we thought they were going to let Lawrie go, but it didn’t happen. It is a good question though- if they intend to nontender a player, why not DFA them before the prospect protection date to protect more players? Edited November 28, 2017 by flavum Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted November 28, 2017 Share Posted November 28, 2017 (edited) QUOTE (flavum @ Nov 28, 2017 -> 12:47 PM) They don’t announce non-tenders until that date. Remember last year when we thought they were going to let Lawrie go, but it didn’t happen. It is a good question though- if they intend to nontender a player, why not DFA them before the prospect protection date to protect more players? I was just thinking that and maybe it has something to do with their status of being arbitration players. Like they can't be released, dfa'd, waived and only non-tendered on this date. Of course, I could be wrong but it sure seems that way. Edited November 28, 2017 by soxfan2014 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowand44 Posted November 28, 2017 Share Posted November 28, 2017 I definitely wouldn't non tender Jose Abreu. Just my opinion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quin Posted November 28, 2017 Share Posted November 28, 2017 QUOTE (Rowand44 @ Nov 28, 2017 -> 04:02 PM) I definitely wouldn't non tender Jose Abreu. Just my opinion. Let's check with Ron Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chitownsportsfan Posted November 29, 2017 Share Posted November 29, 2017 Projected ARB salaries: https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2017/10/proj...s-for-2018.html Avi seems too cheap, Jose a bit too high, imo. Not sure if any of those relievers is worth bringing back. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiSox59 Posted November 29, 2017 Share Posted November 29, 2017 QUOTE (soxfan2014 @ Nov 28, 2017 -> 01:44 PM) Is there some sort of rule where they have to wait til this week to non-tender players? I would think if they non-tendered anyone, it would have happened to make room to protect prospects on the 40. My thoughts exactly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lip Man 1 Posted November 29, 2017 Share Posted November 29, 2017 Jose Abreu Leury Garcia Avisail Garcia Al Albuquerque Danny Farquhar Jake Petricka Zach Putnam Carlos Rodon Yolmer Sanchez If it were me I'd say "he gone" to Albuquerque, Farquhar, Petricka, Putnam and maybe Sanchez. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackSox13 Posted November 29, 2017 Share Posted November 29, 2017 QUOTE (Lip Man 1 @ Nov 28, 2017 -> 10:11 PM) Jose Abreu Leury Garcia Avisail Garcia Al Albuquerque Danny Farquhar Jake Petricka Zach Putnam Carlos Rodon Yolmer Sanchez If it were me I'd say "he gone" to Albuquerque, Farquhar, Petricka, Putnam and maybe Sanchez. Sanchez, really? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lasttriptotulsa Posted November 29, 2017 Share Posted November 29, 2017 QUOTE (Lip Man 1 @ Nov 28, 2017 -> 10:11 PM) Jose Abreu Leury Garcia Avisail Garcia Al Albuquerque Danny Farquhar Jake Petricka Zach Putnam Carlos Rodon Yolmer Sanchez If it were me I'd say "he gone" to Albuquerque, Farquhar, Petricka, Putnam and maybe Sanchez. This has got to be a joke right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JUSTgottaBELIEVE Posted November 29, 2017 Share Posted November 29, 2017 This one surprised me... 2017 @baseball_ref WAR 3.5 Yolmer Sánchez 3.5 Manny Machado 3.4 Robinson Canó https://mobile.twitter.com/ckamka/status/935630090876092416 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago White Sox Posted November 29, 2017 Share Posted November 29, 2017 (edited) QUOTE (lasttriptotulsa @ Nov 29, 2017 -> 07:09 AM) This has got to be a joke right? If not, I’ve lost a lot of respect for Lip. No one that actually watched him play last year would consider non-tendering at this price point. Worst case scenario he should be a solid reserve IF, best case he can be a decent bridge 3B. Either way, he’s worth the $2M or he’s projected to make next year. Edited November 29, 2017 by Chicago White Sox Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted November 29, 2017 Share Posted November 29, 2017 QUOTE (Lip Man 1 @ Nov 28, 2017 -> 10:11 PM) Jose Abreu Leury Garcia Avisail Garcia Al Albuquerque Danny Farquhar Jake Petricka Zach Putnam Carlos Rodon Yolmer Sanchez If it were me I'd say "he gone" to Albuquerque, Farquhar, Petricka, Putnam and maybe Sanchez. And we are supposed to trust your eye test over stats? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted November 29, 2017 Share Posted November 29, 2017 I wonder if the Angels would be interested in Sanchez. They have a big hole at 2B. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago White Sox Posted November 29, 2017 Share Posted November 29, 2017 (edited) QUOTE (soxfan2014 @ Nov 29, 2017 -> 07:43 AM) I wonder if the Angels would be interested in Sanchez. They have a big hole at 2B. We have four years of control left with him. I’d give him the 3B job to start the year and then reevaluate things at the trade deadline or more likely next offseason. No reason to rush a trade with him when he can still build up his value and when there’s a chance we may need him. Edited November 29, 2017 by Chicago White Sox Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted November 29, 2017 Share Posted November 29, 2017 (edited) QUOTE (Chicago White Sox @ Nov 29, 2017 -> 07:53 AM) We have four years of control left with him. I’d give him the 3B job to start the year and then reevaluate things at the trade or more likely in next offseason. No reason to rush a trade with him when there’s a chance we may need him. Oh absolutely. I love him in as a bench piece that can start regularly if needed for injury. Was just tossing out teams that might be willing to pay for him. I know the Angels farm isn't stacked, but they aren't rebuilding during the Trout era. Edited November 29, 2017 by soxfan2014 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ron883 Posted November 29, 2017 Share Posted November 29, 2017 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Nov 29, 2017 -> 07:26 AM) And we are supposed to trust your eye test over stats? Trust him, he was on TV for 15 years. He knows this stuff Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GGajewski18 Posted November 29, 2017 Share Posted November 29, 2017 QUOTE (Lip Man 1 @ Nov 28, 2017 -> 10:11 PM) Jose Abreu Leury Garcia Avisail Garcia Al Albuquerque Danny Farquhar Jake Petricka Zach Putnam Carlos Rodon Yolmer Sanchez If it were me I'd say "he gone" to Albuquerque, Farquhar, Petricka, Putnam and maybe Sanchez. This hot take should put you in timeout from posting. Just awful. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunt Posted November 29, 2017 Share Posted November 29, 2017 QUOTE (Lip Man 1 @ Nov 28, 2017 -> 10:11 PM) Jose Abreu Leury Garcia Avisail Garcia Al Albuquerque Danny Farquhar Jake Petricka Zach Putnam Carlos Rodon Yolmer Sanchez If it were me I'd say "he gone" to Albuquerque, Farquhar, Petricka, Putnam and maybe Sanchez. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted November 29, 2017 Share Posted November 29, 2017 QUOTE (soxfan2014 @ Nov 28, 2017 -> 12:44 PM) Is there some sort of rule where they have to wait til this week to non-tender players? I would think if they non-tendered anyone, it would have happened to make room to protect prospects on the 40. Thinking back to the 40 man roster crunch last week, I do not recall a single player being non-tendered, so I would imagine the answer is yes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.