Jump to content

Offseason Part 2 - Lets the Rumors & Action Begin


Chisoxfn
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Jack Parkman said:

The only part of that post that wasn't sarcastic was the last line. I do think the fanbase should be allowed to vote to force ownership to sell. Then they'd have to be accountable to someone. 

They are only accountable to shareholders. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, maxjusttyped said:

Whoever signed off on replacing Madrigal with utility players. I'll say that's ultimately Hahn's call.

If you listen to the people with supposed sources,  they all soured on Madrigal.  

Personally, I thought he was a useful player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ptatc said:

If you listen to the people with supposed sources,  they all soured on Madrigal.  

Personally, I thought he was a useful player.

Madrigal was a top 10 2nd basemen (by fWAR) at the time of his injury. His bat clearly plays at the big league level and I think he was making strides before the injury. I don't want to have another Madrigal debate with anyone, really, but he was objectively a very productive player and clearly better than the utility guys they've brought in to replace him.

  • Like 3
  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, maxjusttyped said:

Madrigal was a top 10 2nd basemen (by fWAR) at the time of his injury. His bat clearly plays at the big league level and I think he was making strides before the injury. I don't want to have another Madrigal debate with anyone, really, but he was objectively a very productive player and clearly better than the utility guys they've brought in to replace him.

Agreed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, maxjusttyped said:

Madrigal was a top 10 2nd basemen (by fWAR) at the time of his injury. His bat clearly plays at the big league level and I think he was making strides before the injury. I don't want to have another Madrigal debate with anyone, really, but he was objectively a very productive player and clearly better than the utility guys they've brought in to replace him.

Before we anoint Nick...he played 6 games after May last year.  He had a major injury the year before. He had a major injury in his last year in college.  I loved his potential but is he not the positional equivalent of Rodon?  

    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, michelangelosmonkey said:

Before we anoint Nick...he played 6 games after May last year.  He had a major injury the year before. He had a major injury in his last year in college.  I loved his potential but is he not the positional equivalent of Rodon?  

    

i would certainly agree that health is a bigger question mark for him going forward than performance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...