I think I'm the only one doing it. Maybe not, but I mention it quite a bit. I think it's a funny bit because the Mets are not as good as they ought to be with an unlimited budget and with the guy everyone thinks is the best GM in the league. I mean, the Mets were way better in 2022, weren't they. I suspect Stearns probably has his fingerprints over the excellent Brewers team this year, systems he developed, but if we follow your logic, the Brewers are a better team because of their new GM and all it took was replacing Stearns. The MLB roster has clearly improved since Stearns left, the W/L record isn't up for debate.
To that point, I think many realize that Rome wasn't built in a day. What you're describing is a team that Hahn/Kenny built and decisions the new GM made to get "prospects" who didn't play for the Major League team last year or most of this year or still aren't in MLB. That singular record is not indicative of future success. "Worst team ever" stings a little, but ultimately I'd rather have the prospects than keeping Tanner Banks, Erick Fedde, Greg Santos, Dylan Cease, etc. Or signing a bunch of veterans without a future on the team. Not all of those trades are working out as we might hope, but we would've obviously performed better if we kept them and what would be the end result? A playoff berth? The team was on a downward trend because of decisions the previous FO made, it seems illogical to stick it on the new guy in his first season. It's simply not how baseball works, did you really expect him to magic up some superstars? Or to make Moncada, Eloy, Benintendi suddenly play well? To go back in time and not hire Grifol? I wish our GM could do magic but it seems like an unrealistic expectation. In terms of magicking up superstars, perhaps Colson doesn't perform like he is now without the new-and-improved Arizona complex. Hahn had years and years to do that but didn't. Kenny's ego would have never delegated responsibility to someone like Brian Bannister or Ryan Fuller. At the time, I thought it was cool that the Sox posted an open position for 'biomechanics analyst' and it seems to be helping and to be the sort of thing that modern MLB teams do that we previously did not.
The organizational culture is clearly much better, it's not two guys micromanaging everything, consequently the players appear to be having fun. There isn't the 'white guy clique' anymore. We're not hearing players talk about how dysfunctional the team is. I probably wouldn't have done the Bummer or Mena trades, ostensibly the in-place systems that scouted those players who were acquired were from the previous front office. Maybe the new GM learns something about acquiring players like Rojas and Nicky Lopez, though it's not like they were paid handsomely or for multiple years; otherwise pretty much every player on the worst team ever was a Hahn/Kenny guy. Some of the reliever signings and trades were a miss, Booser this season is clearly a miss, but they're just relief pitchers and ultimately it's pretty marginal. Are Fajardo and Mena moving the needle? You'd probably prefer to have them, but it's not of the caliber of trading Tatis or Semien for bad, old pitchers. Although, seems like there was improvement in that department, the free version of 'Inside Edge' seems to think the Sox are pretty good at that this season relative to other MLB teams (see bottom).
In terms of building a team for the future, you ought to be paying attention to what the rest of the organization is doing. It takes time in baseball relative to other sports. To me, that's a lot of the fun about talking about baseball. It takes some time to bear fruit. Some amount of guesswork and prediction is involved and I could be totally wrong, I'm not the sharpest mind, but we all have access to the same information to help guide our perspective. The White Sox will probably bear fruit before the Bulls though, that's an actually poorly-run organization.
In fairness, I can understand why that's not appealing to a lot of people, to go through a rebuild, especially when we fans have been burnt before. It's still a necessary evil unless you're the Yankees or Dodgers. The Sox weren't fun to watch last year. Birmingham was a lot of fun to watch and I bought some of their merchandise. Although I'm still waiting for someone to say "hey nice hat" instead of "why are you wearing a Red Sox hat?". Some homeless guy in my neighborhood yelled at me because I was wearing my '83 Sox hat too much ("we stopped wearing that hat 40 years ago!" or something), but I digress. Now some of those Birmingham guys are in the MLB and are still fun to watch, they're actually performing, at the highest level. And are continuing to improve. I completely tuned out of the Sox by this point last season, I'm heartened by the performance of our young players and I wonder why we all aren't. It's fun when they have good games and I don't really care when Owen Wilson or whatever 30-year-old reliever who won't be on the team next year blows the game. Baseball is fun, it isn't that serious, and sometimes being optimistic is the same thing as being logical.
Anyway, this is my essay for the week.