I sometimes wonder what would happen if you could get a critical mass of posters to sign a pact stipulating to something like the following:
1) The on-field results from 2007-2016 were unacceptable
2) It is fair and appropriate to criticize the ownership and management from that era for those results
3) It is fair and appropriate to be worried that the same regime is now in charge of the rebuild, given their past failures
4) Nonetheless, that regime broke meaningfully with past practice in undertaking a full-fledged rebuild in late 2016
5) The rebuild, while necessarily uncertain given its incompleteness, is showing at least some promising results
6) The full success of the rebuild cannot be judged until 2020 or 2021 when the key prospects have arrived and seen some testing at the big league level
7) It would be disruptive to change course dramatically when that key period is upon us (or substitute that, even if not disruptive, it is a waste of mental energy to pine for the architects of a rebuild to be fired at such a critical juncture), SO...
8) Let's withhold judgment a little while longer--and decide whether our skepticism in this regime was warranted or misplaced--after the next couple of years play out.
I think we could absolutely slash the length of most threads. You could just say a magic word like: "PACT" instead of hashing through the above points over and over in different contexts, different combinations, and different sequences.
I suppose it would spoil some of the fun, though.