Jump to content

White Sox agree to 1 year deal with INF Josh Rojas


Recommended Posts

34 minutes ago, WestEddy said:

He's at 4.126 service days, so probably about 2 months into the season. 

I think it'd be a lot more than that. 172 days on active roster is a full year of service. He only has 12.6% of the 5th year. It's more like 120 games into the season he'll reach the 5 year mark. Not that it really matters, he's not getting optioned. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, ChiSox59 said:

I think it'd be a lot more than that. 172 days on active roster is a full year of service. He only has 12.6% of the 5th year. It's more like 120 games into the season he'll reach the 5 year mark. Not that it really matters, he's not getting optioned. 

I’m pretty sure this doesn’t work like normal decimals - 4.126 years means he has 4 years and 126 days of service time. That’s like 4.8 years.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Balta1701 said:

I’m pretty sure this doesn’t work like normal decimals - 4.126 years means he has 4 years and 126 days of service time. That’s like 4.8 years.

Thanks for clarifying, didn't realize that.  In that case, @WestEddy was spot on, my apologies. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ChiSox59 said:

Thanks for clarifying, didn't realize that.  In that case, @WestEddy was spot on, my apologies. 

I never realized that either. I guess baseball loves to use unconventional decimals. As we all know, when a guy pitches six and a third innings, it’s 6.1 innings instead of 6.333. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Snopek said:

And now the Lux for Robert trade to undo all of the Getz goodwill from the Crochet deal.

 

9 minutes ago, fathom said:

Was just gonna say, welcome to Chicago, Gavin

But where's he gonna play? It makes no sense even if the INF wasn't already super crowded. Makes even less sense now. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, ChiSox59 said:

 

But where's he gonna play? It makes no sense even if the INF wasn't already super crowded. Makes even less sense now. 

If we can roster 15 catchers then we can roster 8 second basemen 

  • Haha 1
  • Paper Bag 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Chicago White Sox said:

Fully agree, it’s not a great 40 man roster but most of the relievers at least are somewhat interesting and/or performed well in small samples.  They also all have options which is a nice plus.  I’d rather keep them then add a true dumpster dive SS.

I don’t want a dumpster dive SS either, I want Kim. He’s 29 years old. Don’t see why they couldn’t afford a 4 or 5 year contract for him at the projected AAV I’ve seen thrown out for him.

edit: just saw he signed for 3, $22M. That’s a joke, Sox should have easily beat that..

Edited by JUSTgottaBELIEVE
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, JUSTgottaBELIEVE said:

I don’t want a dumpster dive SS either, I want Kim. He’s 29 years old. Don’t see why they couldn’t afford a 4 or 5 year contract for him at the projected AAV I’ve seen thrown out for him.

edit: just saw he signed for 3, $22M. That’s a joke, Sox should have easily beat that..

Should, yes.

But that's far too rich for their blood.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, JUSTgottaBELIEVE said:

Yea, I want Ha-seong, not to be confused with Hye-seong like I just did

The sticking point is that shoulder after surgery...he still might miss the first 2-3 months of the 2025 season.

He's a $100-150 million player without that hanging over negotiations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...