So, if the Bears are serious about committing something like $2-3B in private funding to the development of a stadium and the rest of the Arlington Park property, you'll tell them to go f$#@ themselves when it comes to infrastructure improvements to the area? What about the Fire building a privately-financed soccer stadium at the 78, should the city and state tell them to the same thing when it comes to infrastructure improvements to the site, which won't be cheap? Same if Ishbia says he'd commit $1B in private money to a new Sox stadium there.
In that case, what should be done with the Arlington Park land, just turn all that land it into a bunch of ugly suburban strip malls, Costcos, warehouses, and townhouses? What about the 78, just let it sit vacant for another 50 years?
And I'm certainly no fan of the McCaskeys, but owning a team that is worth $8B doesn't mean they have $8B sitting around in the bank or some other liquid investments.
My biggest problem with the Bears deal is that the taxpayers are still on the hook for over $500M for the botched 2002 Soldier Field rebuild. All that money for a stadium that quickly became functionally obsolete.