Jump to content

Offseason Part 3 - Because Part 2 Was a Dud


CentralChamps21
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Y2Jimmy0 said:

I got the same DM as Dave a few weeks back. So weird 

I feel like he’s going to sign a deal like Rodon but for a few million less per year.  Gives the signing team some protection where they can bring him back if he has a big year.  Have a very hard time seeing any team give him four years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, fathom said:

I feel like he’s going to sign a deal like Rodon but for a few million less per year.  Gives the signing team some protection where they can bring him back if he has a big year.  Have a very hard time seeing any team give him four years.

Sox would be really dumb to not sign him on a deal like that. Very little risk if it’s only 2 years and he would be here for the peak of the window.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Chicago White Sox said:

I think the value equation for them losing a pick for a short term deal with Conforto is too costly.

Revenue Sharing Recipients: Brewers, Diamondbacks, Guardians, Marlins, Mariners, Orioles, Pirates, Rays, Reds, Rockies, Royals, Tigers, Twins

These 13 teams received revenue sharing and did not exceed the competitive balance tax. If one of these teams signs a qualified free agent, it forfeits its third-highest pick. These teams face the smallest draft pick penalty.  Of this group, the Mariners and Tigers seem to be the most likely to sign a qualified free agent, but others like the Twins and Marlins are possible.

 

(How the Mariners and Rockies got on this list, no idea…)

Edited by caulfield12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Chicago White Sox said:

I think the value equation for them losing a pick for a short term deal with Conforto is too costly.

If they value Conforto as the missing piece...that's only the 60th. draft pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Harold's Leg Lift said:

Strap on a pair, Hahn!

Do the Sox have anything that can match what the Padres can offer?

The Sox need pitching. They can't afford to really part with pitching. If that what the pirates want, I can't see the Sox as a match.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, ptatc said:

Do the Sox have anything that can match what the Padres can offer?

The Sox need pitching. They can't afford to really part with pitching. If that what the pirates want, I can't see the Sox as a match.

No. If the Padres decide to pay for this player, the White Sox could not match it without moving guys they would not move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ptatc said:

Do the Sox have anything that can match what the Padres can offer?

The Sox need pitching. They can't afford to really part with pitching. If that what the pirates want, I can't see the Sox as a match.

Eh, vaughn+, but we aren't a great system to make deals like this. I don't think Cherington would want a player with his clock started. But he may very well like some of our young talent, or a vera, or a ramos more than industry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Quin locked this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...